Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Nurse-led heart failure management improved quality of life and was cost-effective

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

P L Hebert

Dr P L Hebert, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA; Paul.Hebert2@va.gov

QUESTION

Is nurse-led heart failure management cost-effective?

METHODS

Design:

cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised, assessor-blinded, controlled trial with 1-year follow-up.

Setting:

4 hospitals in Harlem, New York, USA.

Patients:

406 community-dwelling adults (mean age 59 y, 54% men) with heart failure. 46% were non-Hispanic black, 33% were Hispanic, and 15% were non-Hispanic white. Follow-up was 81%.

Intervention:

nurse-led heart failure management (n = 203) or usual care (n = 203). The intervention consisted of 1 in-person visit and periodic telephone calls to educate patients about heart failure and encourage adherence to medications and a low-salt diet, and co-ordination with patients’ physicians to optimise heart failure medications.

Outcomes:

quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) calculated from quality-of-life scores on the Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI3) …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Source of funding: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.