Original contribution
A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(05)82656-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Study objective:

To develop decision rules that will predict fractures in patients with ankle injuries, thereby assisting clinicians in being more selective in their use of radiography.

Design:

Prospective survey of emergency department patients over a five-month period.

Setting:

Two university hospital EDs.

Participants:

One hundred fifty-five adults in a pilot stage and 750 in the main study; all presented with acute blunt ankle injuries.

Interventions:

Thirty-two standardized clinical variables were assessed and recorded on data sheets by staff emergency physicians before radiography.

Measurements:

Variables were assessed for reliability by the kappa coefficient and for association with significant fracture on both ankle and foot radiographic series by univariate analysis. The data then were analyzed by logistic regression and recursive partitioning techniques to develop decision rules for predicting fractures in each radiographic series.

Main results:

All 70 significant malleolar fractures found in the 689 ankle radiographic series performed were identified among people who had pain near the malleoli and were age 55 years or more, had localized bone tenderness of the posterior edge or tip of either malleolus, or were unable to bear weight both immediately after the injury and in the ED. This rule was 100% sensitive and 40.1% specific for detecting malleolar fractures and would allow a reduction of 36.0% of ankle radiographic series ordered. Similarly, all 32 significant midfoot fractures on the 230 foot radiographic series performed were found among patients with pain in the midfoot and bone tenderness at the base of the fifth metatarsal, the cuboid, or the navicular.

Conclusion:

Highly sensitive decision rules have been developed and will now be validated; these may permit clinicians to confidently reduce the number of radiographs ordered in patients with ankle injuries.

References (37)

  • DunlopMG et al.

    Guidelines for selective radiological assessment of inversion ankle injuries

    Br Med J

    (1986)
  • SujitkumarP et al.

    Sprain or fracture? An Analysis of 2,000 ankle injuries

    Arch Emerg Med

    (1986)
  • DiehrP et al.

    Prediction of fracture in patients with acute musculoskeletal ankle trauma

    Med Decis Making

    (1988)
  • BrandDA et al.

    A protocol for selecting patients with injured extremities who need x-rays

    N Engl J Med

    (1982)
  • AbramsHL

    The “overutilization” of x-rays

    N Engl J Med

    (1979)
  • CockshottWP et al.

    Limiting the use of routine radiography for acute ankle injuries

    Can Med Assoc J

    (1983)
  • GleadhillDNS et al.

    Can more efficient use be made of x-ray examinations in the accident and emergency department?

    Br Med J

    (1987)
  • BellRS et al.

    The utility and futility of radiographic skull examination for trauma

    N Engl J Med

    (1971)
  • Cited by (527)

    • A Narrative Review of the Uses of Ultrasound in the Evaluation, Analgesia, and Treatment of Distal Forearm Fractures

      2022, Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Inadequate reductions may require removal of the splint, further anesthesia, and attempts at reduction, and additional post-reduction radiographs. There is increased morbidity associated with repeat reductions, increased pain, additional radiation, and increased length of stay resulting from failed reduction attempts (44,45). In standard practice, many providers choose to reduce the fracture by palpation alone.

    • High risk and low prevalence diseases: Hemophilia emergencies

      2022, American Journal of Emergency Medicine
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Presented at the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting in Washington, DC, May 1991.

    This study was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Health of Ontario.

    1

    Dr Stiell is a Career Scientist of the Ontario Ministry of Health.

    View full text