Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 356, Issue 9236, 30 September 2000, Pages 1131-1136
The Lancet

Articles
Efficacy of selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors in premenstrual syndrome: a systematic review

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02754-9Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are increasingly being used as first-line therapy for severe premenstrual syndrome (PMS). We undertook a meta-analysis on the efficacy of SSRIs in this disorder.

Methods

We searched medical and scientific databases, approached pharmaceutical companies, and reviewed citations of relevant articles to identify 29 studies of the use of SSRIs in PMS. 14 were excluded (no placebo group, preliminary report of included trial, or low quality). 15 randomised placebo-controlled trials were included. Information on study design, participants, drugs used and dosing regimens, outcome measures, sideeffects, and sources of funding was extracted. Standardised mean differences between treatment and placebo groups were calculated to obtain an overall estimate of efficacy. The primary outcome measure was a reduction in overall PMS symptoms.

Findings

The primary analysis included data on 904 women (570 assigned active treatment and 435 assigned placebo, including 101 in crossover trials). The overall standardised mean difference was −1·066 (95% CI −1·381 to −0·750), which corresponds to an odds ratio of 6·91 (3·90 to 12·2) in favour of SSRIs. SSRIs were effective in treating physical and behavioural symptoms. There was no significant difference in symptom reduction between continuous and intermittent dosing or between trials funded by pharmaceutical companies and those independently funded. Withdrawal due to sideeffects was 2·5 times more likely in the active-treatment group than in the placebo group.

Interpretation

SSRIs are an effective first-line therapy for severe PMS. The safety of these drugs has been demonstrated in trials of affective disorder, and the side-effects at low doses are generally acceptable.

Introduction

Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) consists of regularly recurring psychological or somatic symptoms, or both; the symptoms occur specifically during the luteal phase of the cycle and are relieved by the onset of, or during, menstruation.1 Mild physiological symptoms occur in about 95% of all women of reproductive age and can be managed by conservative lifestyle changes such as alterations in diet. However, for about 5% of women, symptoms are so severe that their lives are completely disrupted during the second half of the cycle; many of these women require pharmacological management.2 Such severe PMS is classified under the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, as premenstrual dysphoric disorder.

The causes of PMS remain unclear and speculative, although many hypotheses have been advanced and many treatments suggested. Moreover, because there is a substantial placebo response, uncontrolled trials have resulted in a proliferation of claims for ineffective therapies. The current consensus is that differential sensitivity to circulating hormones, rather than abnormal hormone concentrations, causes PMS.3 There is increasing evidence that serotonin is important in the pathogenesis of PMS,4, 5 and selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are increasingly being used as the first-line therapy.6 Fluoxetine has recently been licensed in the UK for premenstrual dysphoric disorder, and has received full approval from the US Food and Drug Administration this year.

We undertook this review to assess the efficacy of SSRIs in the management of severe PMS.

Section snippets

Trials

We searched databases for reports of published clinical trials of SSRIs in the management of PMS. MeSH terms used were premenstrual syndrome and SSRI, together with title and abstract searches for keywords serotonin and SSRI, premenstrual syndrome, premenstrual dysphoria, premenstrual tension, late luteal-phase dysphoric disorder, and premenstrual dysphoric disorder. We contacted pharmaceutical companies that manufacture SSRIs. The trials were identified by searches of EMBASE (1988 to 1998),

Results

We identified 29 published trials of SSRIs in the management of PMS. Of these, ten trials12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 were open and did not include a placebo group,20 three were preliminary reports of included trials22, 23, 24 and one was of low quality25 as determined by the Jadad score. Thus, 15 randomised placebo-controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis (table 1).6, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 One trial6 used two dosing regimens and another26

Discussion

The pooled standardised mean difference for the effect of SSRIs on PMS strongly favours treatment over placebo.

We found no significant evidence of bias in study selection, and our check of unreported negative trials confirmed that there would need to be twice as many missing trials as existing published trials. The existence of so many unreported trials is unlikely, and therefore the pooled standardised mean difference is unlikely to be a result of biased study sampling. A subanalysis of the

References (42)

  • AJ Rapkin et al.

    Whole-blood serotonin in premenstrual syndrome

    Obstet Gynecol

    (1987)
  • M Steiner et al.

    Fluoxetine in the treatment of premenstrual dysphoria: Canadian Fluoxetine/Premenstrual Dysphoria Collaborative Study Group

    N Engl J Med

    (1995)
  • J Cohen

    Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences

    (1988)
  • C Chatfield

    Statistics for technology

    (1978)
  • V Hasselblad et al.

    Meta-analysis of screening and diagnostic tests

    Psychol Bull

    (1995)
  • M Egger et al.

    Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

    BMJ

    (1997)
  • JJ de la Gandara Martin

    Premenstrual dysphoric disorder: long-term treatment with fluoxetine and discontinuation

    Actas Luso Esp Neurol Psiquiatr Cienc Afines

    (1997)
  • TB Pearlstein et al.

    Long-term fluoxetine treatment of late luteal phase dysphoric disorder

    J Clin Psychiatry

    (1994)
  • ML Elks

    Open trial of fluoxetine therapy for premenstrual syndrome

    South Med J

    (1993)
  • S Brandenburg et al.

    Treatment of premenstrual syndrome with fluoxetine: an open study

    Int Clin Psychopharmacol

    (1993)
  • EW Freeman et al.

    Sertraline versus desipramine in the treatment of premenstrual syndrome: an open-label trial

    J Clin Psychiatry

    (1996)
  • Cited by (307)

    • Premenstrual disorders and PMDD - a review

      2024, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
    • How and Why Are Irritability and Depression Linked?

      2021, Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America
    • Examination of the Effects of Cannabidiol on Menstrual-Related Symptoms

      2024, Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text