Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Systematic review reveals marginal overestimation in children’s recalled pain intensity
  1. Jiale Hu1,
  2. Sarah Jingying Zhang2
  1. 1Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
  2. 2University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr. Jiale Hu; jhu4{at}vcu.edu; Dr. Sarah Jingying Zhang; Sarahjingyingz{at}usf.edu

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Commentary on:Cuenca-Martínez F, Herranz-Gómez A, Varangot-Reille C, et al. Pain memory in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis with a meta-regression. Pain 2024;165(7):1450–63. doi:00000000317010.1097/j.pain.0000

Implications for practice and research

  • The recalled pain intensity tends to be overestimated compared with actual experienced pain, particularly in clinical settings, and the accuracy of pain memory can be influenced by age and gender.

  • Although the current heterogeneity of the study designs makes it difficult to analyse all the predictors, memory reframing interventions should be used to reduce biased pain memories.

Context

Reporting current pain or pain memories are both crucial for accurate pain diagnosis. Recalling past pain experiences in children is influenced by age, with memory accuracy generally improving with cognitive development.1 Other factors such as recall delay, pain context and type of pain might affect recollection.2 Trait anxiety and fear can also impact memory distortion, but findings are inconsistent.3 Although understanding the influences on pain memory can aid in better pain treatments and clinical prediction in children, a systematic summary of these factors is lacking.

Methods

This systematic review used a meta-analysis and a meta-regression to evaluate the accuracy of children’s pain memories (ie, less than 18 years old) and explore its influencing factors. Studies were included if they were observational studies or controlled groups in randomised controlled trials (RCT) reporting actual and recalled pain intensity in acute, chronic or experimental pain. A meta-analysis was employed to compare the differences between the experienced and recalled pain intensities across the studies. A Q-test analysis was applied to determine the differences in pain context (clinical vs experimental). A meta-regression analysis using the weighted least squares method was performed to identify the influencing factors.

Findings

A total of 12 observational studies and three RCTs with 942 participants were ultimately included in the review.4 The meta-analysis revealed a small effect size, indicating an overestimation in recalled pain intensity compared with experienced pain (Standardized Mean Difference, SMD=0.28), especially in the clinical context (SMD=0.33). Only the average age of participants (β=0.08, R²=28.28%) and the proportion of female participants (β=0.03, R²=32.62%) were significantly associated with the accuracy of pain memory. To be noted, R² indicates the percentage of variance in the data that is explained by the factor.

Commentary

Pain memory is an essential basis of pain diagnoses and treatments and will influence children’s experiences and decisions regarding future medical care. This paper highlights that children’s recollections of pain can significantly differ from the pain experienced, with overestimation being common. This distortion in pain memory is influenced by factors like age, gender, cognitive development and the context in which the pain occurred. However, the studies included in the analysis varied in the designs, sample sizes and pain contexts, leading to inconsistencies in the findings. For example, some studies did not assess baseline pain intensity immediately after the painful event until 2–6 weeks post-surgery, which could lead to inaccurate baseline measures and affect the comparison with recalled pain intensity. In addition, the quality of studies included in the analysis is not high, with only three relevant RCT studies and 12 observational studies.

Despite the clinical heterogeneity across the studies in the meta-analyses, the findings align with existing literature that children’s pain memories are often biased.5 The study supports the notion that pain memory in children is influenced by cognitive development and emotional factors such as anxiety and fear. When assessing pain memory, practitioners should consider the potential for children particularly in the ages of 5–7 years old to overestimate pain memory in clinical settings. In addition, pain memory can be exacerbated if it is perceived as less controllable and more threatening in comparison to more controlled settings. Future research is needed to develop age-appropriate pain assessment tools and memory-reframing techniques to reduce biased pain memories in the paediatric population.6

References

Footnotes

  • JH and SJZ joint first authors

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.