Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Commentary on: Kuehn L, Jones A, Helmkamp L et al Socioemotional Development of Infants and Toddlers During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Paediatr 2023;178(2):151–159
Implications for practice and research
All practitioners involved in the care of children should consider the negative impact that the pandemic has had on socioemotional development as these children move through their lives, recognising that their understanding of nursing care may be different.
Considering the already widespread usage of questionnaires to measure development, there is scope to explore the long-term impact of this known delay on their childhood, adolescence and adult life.
Context
There is a known anecdotal link between the COVID-19 pandemic and poor socioemotional development among children exposed to the dramatic and often frightening restrictions and risks associated with it. Nurses have recognised the difficulties that infants and children have presented within aspects of their development, such as delays in speech and language, social skills and self-care skills, as they progress through childhood. This study provides a statistical link between exposure to the pandemic and delayed socioemotional development using a large scale retrospective cohort sample. There are many applications for this work to nursing practice worldwide, as an entire generation has experienced the same global pandemic.
Methods
Data for this study was collected from the national database of the Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) programme with informed consent gained from participants during NFP enrolment. Ages and Stages Questionnaire Third Edition (ASQ-3) and Ages and Stages Questionnaire Social-Emotional Second Edition questionnaires developed in the USA and routinely used to assess development were used across a retrospective cohort sample of 60 171 families. Four cohorts were included across different stages of the pandemic from 2015 to 2021 and outcomes of the questionnaires were analysed. Eligibility criteria included birth between the years of study, singleton birth and 37 weeks or more gestation with covariates considered for other variables known to influence development, such as parental substance misuse.
Findings
The results indicate delayed socioemotional development across all pandemic cohorts compared with pre pandemic. This was evident at 12 months old (pre pandemic : OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.66; pandemic 2: OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.30 to 1.96; pandemic 3: OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.61 to 2.33) and 18 months old (pre pandemic: OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.29 to 2.00; pandemic 3: OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.50 to 2.32). A significant increase in the identification of delay in communication skills specifically has also been identified at 18 months old and 10 months old when adjusted for demographics and family risks.
Commentary
The findings of this study support what has been known anecdotally among practitioners since the COVID-19 pandemic—that there is a significant delay in developmental progress, in particular socioemotional skills, among exposed children. This study contributes to the emerging research conversation around how severe these delays are and the long-term impact on this generation of children through the identification of significant delays in development.
Penna et al’s3 global scoping review identified a clear need for research into the impact the pandemic has had on child development and how this will impact children in later years both worldwide and in the UK; this study provides significant findings to move this ongoing research conversation forward. Byrne et al1 have highlighted concerns with communication development for children aged 2 born in the UK during the pandemic, which correlates with the findings from Kuehn et al.2
The use of ASQs is used across child health services around the world to assess child development and provide a solid base from which to explore the impact of the findings through further research. A limitation of the use of the questionnaires is that they rely on parental self report, which in turn relies on parental knowledge and engagement—it can be difficult to truly assess a child’s development without direct observation. The researchers took measures to control for external variables known to impact child development; however, there is scope to explore this further as knowledge of the impact of the pandemic on family life expands. It must be acknowledged that a generation of children has experienced the pandemic, and the impact on this generation will continue to emerge for many years to come.
Footnotes
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.