Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Understanding symptom clusters and measurement in patients with lung cancer: enhancing person-centred care through patient-reported outcome measures
  1. Alp Ozel
  1. Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkey
  1. Correspondence to Dr Alp Ozel, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal Universitesi, Bolu, Turkey; ptalpozel{at}gmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Commentary on: Karlsson K, Olsson C, Erlandsson A, et al. Exploring symptom clusters and their measurements in patients with lung cancer: a scoping review for practice and research. Oncol Nurs Forum 2023;50(6):783–815.

Implications for practice and research

  • Detailed symptom assessments considering intensity, timing and distress levels should be conducted to create patient-specific treatment plans and enhance personalised care.

  • Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of psychological and social support interventions and the cultural adaptation of symptom assessment tools to improve patients’ psychosocial well-being.

Context

Lung cancer stands as the foremost contributor to global cancer mortality, impacting individuals of all genders.1 Patients with cancer frequently endure a spectrum of symptoms, several of which persist without adequate relief.2 Dodd et al coined the term ‘symptom clusters’ to describe this phenomenon.3 The combination (cluster) of symptoms in patients with lung cancer, the factors that influence these symptoms and how having multiple symptoms affects peoples’ abilities to function requires more investigation.

Methods

In their study, Karlsson et al4 employed a scoping review methodology to map …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.