Article Text

Exposure to in utero cannabis is linked to a higher risk of low birthweight, prematurity and admission to a neonatal unit
  1. J Petty
  1. University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr J Petty, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Herts, UK; j.petty{at}herts.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Commentary on: Avalos LA, Adams SR, Alexeeff SE, et al. Neonatal outcomes associated with in utero cannabis exposure: a population-based retrospective cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023; Nov 27. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.11.1232.

Implications for practice and research

  • Healthcare professionals should provide counselling for anyone who is pregnant about how prenatal cannabis use can lead to adverse infant health outcomes.

  • Further exploration is needed of the potential impact of prenatal cannabis on longer term outcomes, including the effects of cannabis strength and usage frequency.

Context

In the USA, the incidence of cannabis use in pregnancy has increased from 3% (2002) to 7% (2017),1 with a higher occurrence in young people and adolescents.2 There is a perception that cannabis is lower risk compared with other prescribed medicines during pregnancy,3 leading to increased accessibility and acceptance. However, there are safety concerns relating to cannabis and therefore, it is recommended to discontinue usage during pregnancy. Research, examining the association of cannabis exposure in pregnancy with neonatal outcomes, …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • X @petty_julia

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer-reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.