Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Social media can adversely impact young peoples’ risk-taking behaviours
  1. Joanna Smith1,2,
  2. Bee O'Shea2
  1. 1Department of Nursing & Midwifery, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
  2. 2Sheffield Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Joanna Smith, Department of Nursing & Midwifery, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK; Joanna.Smith{at}shu.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Commentary on: Purba AK, Thomson RM, Henery PM, et al. Social media use and health risk behaviours in young people: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2023;383:e073552.

Implications for practice and research

  • Social media is part of young peoples’ (YP) everyday life including interacting with peers and sourcing information.

  • Multimodal methods such as online health literacy education and promoting positive health behaviours could contribute to safe social media use in YP.

Context

Worldwide, young people (YP) have a notable online presence with the majority of Instagram and X (formerly Twitter) users <35 years of age. WHO has recognised the potential role and impact of social media to improve health outcomes and the generation of misinformation.1 Although YP have a noticeable online presence, the impact on health behaviours remains unclear. The systematic review by Purba et al2 of social media use and YP’s health-associated risk-taking behaviours (eg, alcohol, drug, tobacco use) and unhealthy lifestyle choices (eg, exercise, diet, gambling, sexual risk taking) …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Twitter @josmith175

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.