You are here

  • Home
  • Online First
  • Renal transplant failure has a devastating impact requiring greater recognition and support

Article Text

Article menu

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
Adult nursing
Quantitative study—other
Renal transplant failure has a devastating impact requiring greater recognition and support
  1. Panduranga S Rao,
  2. Julie Wright Nunes
  1. Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
  1. Correspondence to: Dr Panduranga S Rao, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, 102 Observatory, Simpson Memorial Building, Ann Arbor, MI 48103, USA; spandu{at}umich.edu

https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2014-102008

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Commentary on: Gill P, Lowes L. Renal transplant failure and disenfranchised grief: participants’ experiences in the first year post-graft failure—a qualitative longitudinal study. Int J Nurs Stud 2014;51:1271–80.OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

    Implications for practice and research

    • Patients returning to dialysis after transplant failure need social support to deal with this loss.

    • The best intervention to address the feeling of isolation needs further study.

    Context

    Four per cent of US patients who started dialysis in 2007 did so because of a failed transplant.1 Although in many instances loss of graft followed a chronic course, in some cases the process was more subacute, taking place over weeks to months. There is limited research examining how patients with a failed or failing graft cope during a potentially tumultuous transition and the impact of graft loss on dialysis re-entry and psychosocial support. This paper attempts to address some of these research gaps.

    Methods

    Sixteen …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests None.