Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Decision aids reduced decisional conflict in patients with newly diagnosed hypertension

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text

Q Do simple or complex decision aids assist patients with newly diagnosed hypertension in deciding whether to start drug treatment?

METHODS

Embedded ImageDesign:

randomised controlled 2 x 2 factorial trial.

Embedded ImageAllocation:

concealed.

Embedded ImageBlinding:

unblinded.

Embedded ImageFollow up period:

2 weeks and 3 months.

Embedded ImageSetting:

21 general practices in Avon, UK.

Embedded ImagePatients:

217 patients aged 30–80 years (mean age 58 y, 52% men) who had sustained high blood pressure (BP) requiring discussion of drug treatment with a general practitioner and were not taking antihypertensive medication. Exclusion criteria: severe hypertension requiring immediate treatment, secondary hypertension, pregnancy associated hypertension, inability to understand English, and dementia or learning difficulties.

Embedded ImageInterventions:

decision analysis (computerised utility assessment interview with individualised risk assessment and decision analysis) (n = 103) or no decision analysis (n = 114) and an information video plus leaflet (n = 106) or …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • A modified version of this abstract appears in Evidence-Based Medicine.

  • For correspondence: Dr A A Montgomery, Division of Primary Health Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. alan.a.montgomerybristol.ac.uk

  • Source of funding: UK Medical Research Council.