Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
QUESTION: Is continuous, low level, topical heat as effective as oral ibuprofen for dysmenorrhoea (menstrual pain)?
Design
Randomised {allocation concealed}*, blinded {patients, clinicians, and outcome assessors}*, controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial with follow up over 2 days of treatment.
Setting
Texas, USA.
Patients
84 non-pregnant women who were ≥18 years (age range 21–50 y) and who predictably had moderate or greater menstrual pain (4 of previous 6 cycles), a history and physical examination consistent with primary dysmenorrhoea, regular menstrual cycles, pain relief from over the counter analgesics, and were using reliable contraception. Exclusion criteria were cutaneous lesions involving the abdominal wall, microvascular disease (including diabetes), known or suspected drug or alcohol abuse, known or suspected contraindication to oral ibuprofen, and recent pregnancy. 79 women (94%) were included in the efficacy analysis.
Intervention
Women were allocated to 1 of 4 treatment groups, each of which comprised …
Footnotes
↵* Information provided by author.
Source of funding: Procter and Gamble Company supplied study devices and materials.
For correspondence: Dr R P Smith, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Truman Medical Center, 2301 Holmes Street, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA. Fax +1 816 556 3556.