You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Child health
Qualitative synthesis
Father-infant skin-to-skin contact appears to be beneficial, however paternal experiences of this need to be explored
  1. Agneta Anderzén-Carlsson
  1. Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden
  1. Correspondence to Dr Agneta Anderzén-Carlsson, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Karlstad University, Karlstad 651 88, Sweden; agneta.anderzen-carlsson{at}kau.se

https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2016-102537

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Commentary on: Shorey S, He HG, Morelius E, et al. Skin-to-skin contact by fathers and the impact on infant and paternal outcomes: an integrative review. Midwifery 2016;40:207–17.

    Implications for practice and research

    • Fathers and infants benefit from fathers practising skin-to-skin contact. Thus, there is evidence for implementing this in practice. However, the prevailing culture, a family centred perspective, including the father’s own will, must be taken into account.

    • Further studies are warranted, including standardised protocols and paternal experiences from different settings.

    Context

    Skin-to skin contact within neonatal intensive care has its origin in Columbia, due to a history of lack of incubators and mothers abandoning their fragile premature and/or sick infants. Today, skin-to-skin contact is part of ordinary care also within high-tech neonatal intensive care units. The evidence is strong that skin-to-skin care has many beneficial outcomes for infants and for mothers,1 but less is known about fathers’ experiences …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.