Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Quantitative—other
Of women seeking assistance for intimate partner violence, those who report victimisation during pregnancy are at higher risk of further victimisation
  1. Julianne C Flanagan
  1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
  1. Correspondence to : Dr Julianne Flanagan, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 5 Charleston Center Dr, Suite 151, Charleston, SC 29401, USA; hellmuth{at}musc.edu

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Commentary on: OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science

Implications for practice and research

  • The benefits of integrating regular intimate partner violence (IPV) screening procedures for pregnant women in clinical settings outweigh the cost of minimal time spent conducting assessments.

  • Healthcare providers must be trained to conduct IPV assessments and provide treatment referrals.

  • Future studies should use larger samples and compare shelter populations with general prenatal care.

Context

Existing literature demonstrates a robust association between IPV victimisation during pregnancy and the following: continued risk for IPV victimisation; mental and physical health problems among mothers; physical and developmental health problems for infants and children.1 ,2 Recent literature …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.