Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Systematic review
Nucleic acid amplification tests are more accurate and cost-effective than the Chlamydia rapid test for diagnosing genital chlamydia
  1. Thomas L Gift
  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  1. Correspondence to Thomas L Gift
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS E-80, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA; tgift{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Commentary on: OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science


Chlamydia is the most prevalent bacterial sexually transmitted infection in the world and has been associated with reproductive sequelae in women, though the frequency with which sequelae develop is not precisely known.1 ,2 As most cases of chlamydia are asymptomatic, screening – primarily of women – has been the primary intervention used to control chlamydia.2 Screening programmes typically involve collecting a specimen from a patient, sending it to a lab for processing and notifying the patient of results and arranging treatment if positive. As Hislop and colleagues …

View Full Text


  • Disclaimer The findings and conclusions in this manuscript are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

  • Competing interests None.