Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Randomised controlled trial
An extended midwifery support programme did not increase breast feeding at 6 months, compared with standard postnatal midwifery support
  1. Louise M Wallace
  1. Coventry University, Coventry, UK
  1. Correspondence to Louise M Wallace
    Applied Research Centre Health & Lifestyles Interventions, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK; l.wallace{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Commentary on: OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science

Breastfeeding for health gain

It is well known that resorting to infant-feeding methods other than breastfeeding has negative implications for both mother and infant. Exclusive breastfeeding is currently promoted for at least the first 6 months of life; however, even in countries where recent efforts have been made to improve initiation of breastfeeding, the trend shows that few babies are exclusively breastfed over this period. The fragility of breastfeeding is underscored by numerous studies that show breastfeeding duration is seldom achieved for as long as intended.

A pragmatic RCT

The study compares a standard midwifery support (SMS) to an extended midwifery programme (EMS) in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) design which recruited 849 mothers and singleton …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests LW is a director and shareholder of Health Behaviour Research Ltd, a company that uses the results of research to provide evidence-based interventions, including training healthcare staff in breastfeeding support skills.