Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Systematic review
Current evidence shows no reduction in mortality or re-infarction rate with early mobilisation following myocardial infarction
  1. Samar Noureddine
  1. Correspondence to Samar Noureddine
    American University of Beirut, Hariri School of Nursing, PO Box 11–0236, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon; sn00{at}aub.edu.lb

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Commentary on: OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death, despite advances in treatment.1 In their systematic review, Cortes and colleagues examined the effect of an appealing intervention, early mobilisation, on mortality and re-infarction rates after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The review is significant given the negative effects of bed rest and its continued prolonged use following AMI in many settings. The authors analysed data using relative risk with a 95% confidence interval. Their meta-analysis of 14 studies showed a 15% lower mortality risk in patients prescribed early mobilisation compared with the controls but no difference in re-infarction rates within 1 year of AMI. The authors concluded that there …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.