You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 12, Issue 4
  • Absolute CVD risk, stratified by risk score, was 20% higher in primary care patients with CVD than in those without CVDCommentary

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Clinical prediction guide
Absolute CVD risk, stratified by risk score, was 20% higher in primary care patients with CVD than in those without CVD

https://doi.org/10.1136/ebn.12.4.123

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Question

    How do risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events compare in primary care patients with and without a history of CVD after adjusting for traditional CVD risk factors?

    Methods

    Design:

    prospective cohort study with a mean 2 years of follow-up.

    Setting:

    primary care practices in Auckland, New Zealand.

    Patients:

    35 760 patients 30–74 years of age (mean age 54 y, 57% men, 10% with a history of CVD) who had a CVD risk score calculated using the web-based PREDICT clinical decision support program.

    Description of prediction guide:

    based on the Framingham risk score, PREDICT uses traditional CVD risk factors (age, sex, diabetes, smoking, blood pressure, and cholesterol concentrations) to classify patients as having <5%, 5 to <10%, 10 to <15%, 15 to <20%, or ⩾20% 5-year risk of a CVD event.

    Outcome:

    first CVD event (acute coronary syndrome, ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke, …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Source of funding Health Research Council.