You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Clinical prediction guide
The Manchester Self Harm Rule had good sensitivity but poor specificity for predicting repeat self harm or suicide

https://doi.org/10.1136/ebn.10.2.61

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Cooper J, Kapur N, Dunning J, et al. A clinical tool for assessing risk after self-harm. Ann Emerg Med 2006;48:459–66.OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science

    Q In patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with self harm, can a simple clinical rule predict repetitions of self harm or suicide in the next 6 months?

    METHODS

    Embedded ImageDesign:

    prospective cohort study with separate derivation and validation data sets.

    Embedded ImageSetting:

    5 EDs in Manchester and Salford, UK.

    Embedded ImagePatients:

    9086 episodes of self harm (intentional self poisoning or self injury) in patients 11–98 years of age (median 30 y, 56% women). Patients who did not wait for assessment or refused treatment were excluded.

    Embedded ImageDescription of prediction guide:

    patients were considered to be at moderate or high risk of repeat self harm or suicide if …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • For correspondence: Dr J Cooper, Centre for Suicide Prevention, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. jayne.cooper{at}manchester.ac.uk

    • Sources of funding: Manchester Health Authority, South Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust, Central Manchester and Manchester Children’s University Hospitals NHS Trust, Pennine Acute NHS Trust, and Mental Health Services of Salford NHS Trust.