Regular Article
Rigour, reliability and validity in qualitative research

https://doi.org/10.1054/cein.2000.0106Get rights and content

Abstract

This article addresses issues relating to rigour within qualitative research, beginning with the need for rigour at all in such studies. The concept of reliability is then analysed, establishing the traditional understanding of the term, and evaluating alternative terms. A similar exploration of validity and proposed alternatives follows. It is suggested that there is nothing to be gained from the use of alternative terms which, on analysis, often prove to be identical to the traditional terms of reliability and validity. Alternative or novel means of addressing these concepts in interpretive research are, however, welcomed. A review of some of the strategies available for the pursuit of reliability and validity in qualitative research is undertaken. These are clearly identified as means to establish existing criteria and are found to have variable value.

References (22)

  • M. Bloor

    On the analysis of observational data: a discussion of the worth and uses of inductive techniques and respondent validation

    Sociology

    (1978)
  • M. Bloor

    Techniques of validation in qualitative research: a critical commentary

  • P. Brink

    Issues of reliability and validity

  • Guba, E. Lincoln, Y. 1985, Effective Evaluation: Improving the Usefulness of Evaluation. San Francisco, Jossey...
  • Guba, E. Lincoln, Y. 1989, Fourth Generation Evaluation. Sage,...
  • J. Hall et al.

    Rigor in feminist research

    Advances in Nursing Science

    (1991)
  • M. Hammersley

    What’s Wrong with Ethnography?

    (1992)
  • M. Hammersley et al.

    Ethnography: Principles in Practice, (2nd edn).

    (1995)
  • Holloway, I. Wheeler, S. 1996, Qualitative Research for Nurses. Blackwell Scientific,...
  • J. Kirk et al.

    Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research.

    (1986)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (266)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text