Original researchA survey of current perianesthesia nursing practice for pain and comfort management
Section snippets
Review of the pain literature
Pain is viewed as an intriguing phenomenon. It is a personal, subjective event that is difficult to verify. The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) and the American Pain Society (APS) define pain as “an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage.”7, 8 In 1968, Margo McCaffery provided a definition for pain that has been appropriate over the years for clinical practice, “Pain is whatever
Review of the comfort literature
Kolcaba defined comfort as “the immediate state of being strengthened through having the human needs for relief, ease, and transcendence met in the physical, psychospiritual, sociocultural, and environmental contexts of experience.”23 Kolcaba’s theory describes comfort as having physical and emotional components, varied meanings, and defined by the person who is experiencing it.23, 24, 25, 26
Bascom27 has a slightly different interpretation of comfort, stating that comfort measures are more
Sample
A convenience sample of 220 perianesthesia nurses from a variety of perianesthesia practice settings, including the Preoperative Phase and Postanesthesia Phases I, II, and III was surveyed. Table 1 provides an overview of nursing roles and responsibilities in these settings. At the time of the survey, the nurses were practicing in rural and urban hospitals, outpatient centers, and freestanding facilities. The nurses voluntarily completed the survey while attending the 2001 ASPAN Annual
Results
Nurses responded “yes” or “no” when asked if pain assessment and identification of the patient’s expected pain/comfort goal were done on admission (Table 2). In the PACU Phase I, one of the immediate priorities is pain assessment. It is common practice to ask patients their level of pain relief and expectations to determine whether discharge criteria are met. Nurses in PACU Phase I in this study consistently demonstrated that they assessed both pain and comfort and identified the patient’s
Discussion
This survey was conducted shortly after the release of both the JCAHO pain management standards15 and the ASPAN Standards of Practice,31 which mandated assessment of pain and comfort on admission. Some of the findings of this study may reflect the newness of these expectations and the perianesthesia nurse’s struggle to meet the standards in today’s rapidly changing health care environment. Pain and comfort assessments present unique challenges in all of the perianesthesia settings. For example,
Implications and suggestions for further research
Findings of this study may be used in the development of institution-specific pain and comfort guidelines and protocols in the perianesthesia settings. Further evaluation of barriers to pain and comfort management specific to perianesthesia settings is also needed. This study underscores the need for increased and sustained emphasis on physician and nursing education that focuses on recommended approaches and trends in pain management such as multimodal analgesia and prevention of the various
Conclusion
Assessment is the cornerstone for providing relief of pain and discomfort in the perianesthesia patient. Comprehensive baseline pain and comfort assessments are critical to the implementation of individualized, effective treatment plans. Initial and ongoing patient education and goal setting provide direction and a way to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment. The findings of this survey reveal that perianesthesia nurses recognize the importance of a thorough pain and comfort assessment;
Dina A. Krenzischek, MAS, RN, CPAN, is Nurse Manager for Prep and Post Anesthesia Care Units at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, MD and is the American Society of Perianesthesia Nurses (ASPAN) Coordinator for the Pain and Comfort Guideline, ASPAN President Elect 2003–2004, and ASPAN President 2004–2005;
References (32)
- et al.
Management and relief of pain in an emergency department from the adult patients’ perspective
J Pain Symptom Manage
(2003) - et al.
The under treatment of pain in ambulatory AIDS patients
Pain
(1996) The challenge of pain assessment in the PACU
J Perianesth Nurs
(2002)- et al.
PACU pain management algorithm
J Perianesth Nurs
(2002) - et al.
Cancer pain management and the JCAHO’s pain standardsAn institutional challenge
J Pain Symptom Manage
(2003) - et al.
A 10-year review of quality improvement monitoring in pain managementRecommendations for standardized outcome measures
Pain Manage Nurs
(2002) - et al.
Acute pain treatment for older adults hospitalized with hip fractureCurrent nursing practices and perceived barriers
Appl Nurs Res
(2003) - et al.
Knowledge and perceived competence of home care nurses in pain managementA national survey
J Pain and Symptom Manage
(2001) - et al.
Nurses’ knowledge of pain in the elderly
J Pain Symptom Manage
(2001) Evolution of the mid range theory of comfort for outcomes research
Nurs Outlook
(2001)
Comfort careA framework for perianesthesia nursing
J Perianesth Nurs
Accountability for pain reliefUse of comfort-function goals
J of Perianesth Nurs
Pain management in the ambulatory surgery outpatient
J Perianesthesia Nurs
The undertreatment of pain
Am J Nurs
Postoperative pain experienceResults from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged
Anesth Analg
Symptoms and suffering at the end of life in children with cancer
N Engl J Med
Cited by (10)
Pain Assessment and Management in Patients After Abdominal Surgery From PACU to the Postoperative Unit
2009, Journal of Perianesthesia NursingCitation Excerpt :Those with minimal discomfort or who were pain free were eligible for discharge from the PACU, indicating adequate pain relief as an essential criteria for the patients before PACU discharge. Krenzischek et al3 surveyed PACU nurses who indicated that a mild or moderate pain score meant patients were comfortable enough to be discharged from the PACU. They also suggested that nurses defined a mild or moderate pain score as being ≤4 using a VAS scale of 0 to 10, <3 cm if using a 1 to 5 scale, or described as moderate or less if using ordinal measures.
Defining Pain Management Objectives
2006, Postoperative Pain ManagementDefining Pain Management Objectives
2006, Postoperative Pain Management: an Evidence-Based Guide to PracticeResearch in the perianesthesia setting: The basics of getting started
2005, Journal of Perianesthesia NursingClinical evaluation of the ASPAN pain and comfort clinical guideline
2004, Journal of Perianesthesia NursingPatients' perception of comfort facilitators during hemodialysis procedure: A qualitative study
2014, Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal
Dina A. Krenzischek, MAS, RN, CPAN, is Nurse Manager for Prep and Post Anesthesia Care Units at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, MD and is the American Society of Perianesthesia Nurses (ASPAN) Coordinator for the Pain and Comfort Guideline, ASPAN President Elect 2003–2004, and ASPAN President 2004–2005;
Pamela Windle, MS, CNA, CPAN, CAPA, is Nurse Manager for Prep and Post Anesthesia Care Units at St. Luke’s Episcopal Hospital in Houston, TX and was an ASPAN Regional Director 2003–2004;
Myrna Mamaril, MS, RN, CPAN, CAPA, is the Clinical Nurse Specialist of the Same Day Prep and Post Anesthesia Care Unit in the Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD and is the ASPAN Director for Research 2004–2005.