Workplace aggression, including bullying in nursing and midwifery: A descriptive survey (the SWAB study)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.06.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Workplace aggression remains an important source of distress among nurses and midwives and has negative effects on staff health, patient care and organisations’ reputation and fiscal health.

Objectives

To report on the nature and extent of workplace aggression, including bullying experienced by nurses and midwives in Victoria, Australia.

Design

A descriptive study design was chosen.

Settings and methods

The Nurses Board of Victoria posted 5000 surveys to the randomly selected registered nurses and midwives in Victoria, Australia, in 2010. The participants were asked about their experiences of violence (from clients) and bullying (from colleagues) within their most recent four working weeks. In addition, the study investigated staff actions following incidents, staff training and safety at work, and what staff believe contribute to incidents. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, including frequencies and percentages. Chi square tests and P value were used to assess differences in categorical data.

Findings

1495 returned questionnaires were included in the study (30% response rate). Over half of the participants (52%) experienced some form of workplace aggression. Thirty-six percent experienced violence mostly from patients or their visitors/relatives and 32% experienced bullying mostly from colleagues or from their managers/supervisors. Significant differences were found between those who experienced aggression from patients and those who were bullied in respect to handling of incidents; factors thought to contribute to incidents; and organisations’ handling of incidents.

Conclusion

The study suggests that staff are less worried by patient initiated aggression compared to bullying from colleagues. For all types of aggression, respondents clearly wanted better/more realistic training, as well as enforcement of policies and support when incidents arise.

Section snippets

Background

The popular conception of nursing or midwifery work is of rewarding experiences and a fulfilling career. And for many this is true. However, a significant number of nurses and midwives have profoundly negative experiences because of workplace aggression (WA) – from patients or their visitors or bullying by colleagues. In a 1995/96 report, Australian registered nurses recorded the second highest number of violent-related workers’ compensation claims, higher than prison and police officers (

Causes of WA

There is a burgeoning literature on the causes of WA, which coalesces around three main types of explanations – ‘internal’ and ‘external’ factors and their ‘interaction’. For instance, ‘internal’ influences relate to properties affecting the patient, such as their personality or the effects of their illness; whereas ‘external’ influences focus on the environment, such as noisy environments or staff shortages. The ‘interactional’ approach acknowledges the interplay of ‘internal’ and ‘external’

Study design

A descriptive study design was chosen. In anticipation of this study, the Nurses Board of Victoria (NBV) included in their 2009 round of annual registration for nurses and midwives the option to indicate if they agreed to be sent invitations to participate in research, which had NBV approval. In 2010, the NBV distributed the questionnaire on behalf of the research team to a random selection (N = 5000) of those who had agreed to receive such invitations. Reply paid envelopes were used to return

Survey response rate

Five thousand questionnaires were posted, with 1513 returned. Two had returned to sender and 16 were blank or mostly incomplete, resulting in 1495 usable questionnaires, representing a response rate of 30%.

Characteristics of respondents

Representativeness of the study sample was assessed by comparing it with labour force data (which had a response rate of 33%) on registered nurses and midwives, and enrolled nurses (second-tier nurses in the Australian health care system) in Victoria (AIHW, 2010), using Index of Dissimilarity

Study limitations

Although the respondents were largely representative of the total population of nurses/midwives in Victoria, we cannot be certain that they hold similar views to those who did not participate in the study. Accordingly, caution should be exercised in generalising findings to the wider population of nurses and midwives in Victoria. Also, there are major problems in comparing studies on WA due to differences in respect to definition of concepts, data collecting methods and sampling, making direct

Conclusion

This is the first large-scale study to draw on the Victorian Department of Human Service's definition of WA in estimating its prevalence among Victorian nurses and midwives. The prevalence of patient-initiated aggression and bullying among staff are clearly documented, which is in line with national (and international) trends. The data presented here suggest that staff are less worried by patient-initiated aggression compared to bullying from colleagues. Clearly, respondents wanted better

Acknowledgements

The researchers are grateful to: Nigel Fidgeon, CEO, Nurses Board of Victoria, for his support of this project, including the in kind assistance he gave in respect to drawing a random sample of potential participants from the Victorian register, and for providing staff to assist with posting the survey; the ANF (Victoria branch) for financial help, and in kind assistance in the production of the questionnaire; Nicholas Gaynor, Nurse Practitioner, Mental Health, Austin Health; for the many

References (40)

  • J. Curtis et al.

    You have no credibility: nursing students’ experiences of horizontal violence

    Nurse Education in Practice

    (2007)
  • K.L. Hesketh et al.

    Workplace violence in Alberta and British Columbia hospitals

    Health Policy

    (2003)
  • M. Agervold

    Bullying at work: a discussion of definitions and prevalence, based on an empirical study

    Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

    (2007)
  • AIHW

    Nursing and Midwifery Labour Force 2008

    (2010)
  • ANA

    Workplace Violence

    (2012)
  • H.C. Cox

    Verbal abuse in nursing: report of a study

    Nursing Management

    (1987)
  • Department of Human Services

    Preventing Occupational Violence in Victorian Health Services – A Policy Framework and Resource Kit

    (2007)
  • G. Farrell et al.

    Nurses under threat: a comparison of content of 28 aggression management programs

    International Journal of Mental Health Nursing

    (2005)
  • G. Farrell et al.

    Facing up to ‘challenging behaviour’: a model for training in staff-client interaction

    Journal of Advanced Nursing

    (2010)
  • G.A. Farrell

    Aggression in clinical settings: nurses’ views

    Journal of Advanced Nursing

    (1997)
  • G.A. Farrell

    Horizontal violence: infection at work

    Hospital & Healthcare

    (2003)
  • G.A. Farrell et al.

    Scoping workplace aggression in nursing: findings from an Australian study

    Journal of Advanced Nursing

    (2006)
  • G.A. Farrell et al.

    Challenging behaviour: an action plan for education and training

    Contemporary Nurse

    (2010)
  • S. Folkman

    Personal control and stress and coping processes: a theoretical analysis

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1984)
  • D.M. Gates et al.

    Violence against caregivers in nursing homes. Expected, tolerated, and accepted

    Journal of Gerontological Nursing

    (1999)
  • J. Grealy

    Prevention and Management of Resistance to Care Project, Final Report

    (2005)
  • Health Care Commission, 2009. National survey of NHS staff 2008. Retrieved from:...
  • D. Hegney et al.

    Workplace violence: differences in perceptions of nursing work between those exposed and those not exposed: a cross-sector analysis

    International Journal of Nursing Practice

    (2010)
  • M.S. Hershcovis et al.

    Towards a multi-foci approach to workplace aggression: a meta-analytic review of outcomes from different perpetrators

    Journal of Organizational Behaviour

    (2010)
  • H. Hoel et al.

    Destructive Conflict and Bullying at Work

    (2000)
  • Cited by (79)

    • Social culture and the bullying of midwifery students whilst on clinical placement: A qualitative descriptive exploration

      2021, Nurse Education in Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      When students enter the midwifery profession they embark on a process of professional socialisation and this is heavily influenced by the culture of the organisation where they undertake clinical placement (Marshall, 2019) and being bullied whilst in this setting has the potential to shape the profession in the future. The existence of a poor workplace culture (Catling et al., 2017) and bullying have been well reported in the maternity context (Gillen et al., 2008; Farrell and Shafiei, 2012). The maternity unit is a relatively enclosed workplace environment that is emotionally challenging and fraught with organisational pressures and tensions (Coldridge and Davies, 2017) which leads to it being a common setting for acts of workplace bullying (Gillen et al., 2008).

    • The way we do things around here. A qualitative study of the workplace aggression experiences of Victorian nurses, midwives and care personnel

      2021, Collegian
      Citation Excerpt :

      An established body of peer-reviewed literature highlights the high rates and concerning impacts of workplace aggression in nursing across the world (Alameddine, Mourad, & Dimassi, 2015; Clausen, Hogh, & Borg, 2012; Edwards & Buckley, 2016; Farrell & Shafiei, 2012; Fujita et al., 2012; Gascón et al., 2009; Spector, Zhou, & Che, 2014).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text