ORIGINAL ARTICLES
A comparison of the effect of diphenhydramine and desloratadine on vigilance and cognitive function during treatment of ragweed-induced allergic rhinitis

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61685-7Get rights and content

Background

Decrements in cognitive performance are associated with the use of sedating antihistamines. Most, but not all, second-generation antihistamines have been found to be nonsedating.

Objective

To examine the central nervous system (CNS) profile of a new second-generation antihistamine, desloratadine.

Methods

Subjects with ragweed-induced allergic rhinitis (aged 18–60 years) who demonstrated a predetermined severity of symptoms after priming with ragweed pollen in the Environmental Exposure Unit were randomized to receive a single dose of desloratadine, 5 mg; diphenhydramine, 50 mg; or placebo. A comprehensive battery of repeatable, automated neuropsychological tests was administered to subjects before treatment (symptomatic baseline) and 90 minutes after taking study medication.

Results

Both desloratadine (P = .04) and diphenhydramine (P < .01) alleviated the symptoms of allergic rhinitis compared with placebo, but treatment with diphenhydramine was associated with clinically meaningful decrements on all vigilance parameters (P < .05 for desloratadine-diphenhydramine contrasts). Also, subjects treated with diphenhydramine performed significantly worse than subjects given desloratadine or placebo across all cognitive domains evaluated. Most effect sizes for the mean desloratadine and diphenhydramine differences were between 0.4 and 0.8 (moderate to high). Stanford Sleepiness Scale scores also indicated significantly more somnolence with diphenhydramine vs desloratadine or placebo (P < .001). There were no significant differences on any of the cognitive parameters between subjects treated with desloratadine and those given placebo.

Conclusions

Desloratadine improved ragweed-induced allergic rhinitis symptoms without adversely affecting performance. Diphenhydramine improved allergic rhinitis symptoms but caused significant decrements in vigilance and cognitive functioning. Thus, efficacy of antihistamine treatment must be balanced against the associated effects on CNS functioning.

REFERENCES (54)

  • RN Ross

    The costs of allergic rhinitis

    Am J Manag Care.

    (1996)
  • J Crystal-Peters et al.

    The cost of productivity losses associated with allergic rhinitis

    Am J Manag Care.

    (2000)
  • P Fireman

    Treatment of allergic rhinitis: effect on occupational productivity and work force costs

    Allergy Asthma Proc.

    (1997)
  • JG Collins et al.

    Health Characteristics of Workers by Occupation and Sex: United States 1983–85

    (1989)
  • FE Simmons

    Antihistamines.

  • IM Cockburn et al.

    Loss of work productivity due to illness and medical treatment

    J Occup Environ Med.

    (1999)
  • R Warren et al.

    Drugs detected in fatally injured drivers in the province of Ontario.

  • T Aso et al.

    Effects of terfenadine on actual driving performance

    Jpn J Pharmacol Ther.

    (1988)
  • JF O'Hanlon et al.

    Antihistamine effects on actual driving performance in a standard test: a summary of the Dutch experience, 1989–1994

    Allergy.

    (1995)
  • EF Vuurman et al.

    Seasonal allergic rhinitis and antihistamine effects on children's learning

    Ann Allergy.

    (1993)
  • F Gengo et al.

    The pharmacodynamics of diphenhydramine-induced drowsiness and changes in mental performance

    Clin Pharmacol Ther.

    (1989)
  • GG Kay et al.

    Initial and steady-state effects of diphenhydramine and loratadine on sedation, cognition, mood, and psychomotor performance

    Arch Intern Med.

    (1997)
  • FM Gengo et al.

    Antihistamines, drowsiness, and psychomotor impairment: central nervous system effect of cetirizine

    Ann Allergy.

    (1987)
  • AN Nicholson et al.

    Antihistamines and visual function: studies on dynamic acuity and the pupillary response to light

    Br J Clin Pharmacol.

    (1982)
  • PS Marshall et al.

    Effects of allergy season on mood and cognitive function

    Ann Allergy.

    (1993)
  • EA Fleishman et al.

    Taxonomies of Human Performance: The Description of Human Tasks

    (1996)
  • H Druce

    Impairment of function by antihistamines

    Ann Allergy.

    (1990)
  • Cited by (50)

    • Effect of salivary secretion with mouthguard use on seasonal allergic rhinitis symptom improvement

      2020, Journal of Oral Biosciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Patients experience symptoms such as sneezing, nasal congestion, and nasal and nasopharyngeal itching and have ocular symptoms like red/itchy and watery eyes [3,4]. Oral antihistamines are the first-line treatment for SAR, of which second-generation agents are preferred due to reduced sedative effects and lack of impairment of cognitive function compared to the first-generation compounds [5,6]. The administration of multiple drugs is associated with reduced compliance and consequently, reduced QOL, and moreover, it can be a source of economic loss owing to the cost of medications [7].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Funding was provided by Integrated Therapeutics Group Inc (a subsidiary of Schering Plough), Kenilworth, New Jersey.

    View full text