Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Delayed versus immediate exercises following surgery for breast cancer: a systematic review

  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background

Seroma formation, wound healing and fluid drainage are a concern for both surgeons and patients. Excessive fluid production can result in seroma formation, and inadequate drainage of seromas is known to cause infection, pain, discomfort and longer periods of hospitalisation. Postoperative exercises given to maintain movement of the arm are believed to increase the amount of fluid production following surgery. This review aimed to determine whether a program of delayed exercises reduces the risk of seroma formation, fluid loss and hospital stay, without loss of arm movement.

Method

A systematic review. RCTs of early versus delayed shoulder mobilisation after surgery in females with breast cancer were included in the review. Outcomes. One or more measurements of shoulder range of motion, wound complications, fluid drainage volumes and incidence of seroma formation. Design. Randomised controlled trials, control group of delayed exercise/mobilisation. Validity assessment was carried out using a data extraction form based on the CONSORT statement. Study characteristics recorded include sample size, intervention, control, period of exercise delay, surgical procedure and conclusions drawn. Data synthesis was carried out using random effects and weighted mean differences to test for heterogeneity and combined effects.

Results

12 RCTs were included in the review of which 6 were included for meta-analysis. Delaying exercises significantly decreases seroma formation (OR=0.4; 95%CI 0.2–0.5; p=0.00001). No significant differences were found for drainage volume or hospital stay.

Conclusion

Current evidence from RCTs supports the use of a delayed program of arm exercises to reduce seroma formation. Clinical and statistical inconsistencies between studies did not allow any conclusions to be drawn regarding the effects of delayed exercises on fluid drainage, hospital stay and immediate or long term ability to move the arm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DR Aitken AG James (1997) ArticleTitleSeromas and physiotherapy after mastectomy Ann Surg Oncol 4 IssueID4 293–297

    Google Scholar 

  2. S Chen M Chen (1998) ArticleTitleTiming of shoulder exercises after modified radical mastectomy: a prospective study Chang Gung Med J 22 IssueID1 37–42

    Google Scholar 

  3. VH Riddell (1948) ArticleTitleRadical mastectomy: the technique and the complications Br J Surg 36 113–129 Occurrence Handle18895118 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaH1c%2FjvVyltw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. M Abe T Iwase T Takeuchi (1998) ArticleTitleA randomised controlled trial on the prevention of seroma after partial or total mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection Breast Cancer 5 IssueID1 67–70 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02967417 Occurrence Handle11091628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. TJ Flew (1979) ArticleTitleWound drainage following radical mastectomy: the effect of restriction of shoulder movement Br J Surg 66 302–305 Occurrence Handle376029 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSaC1cflsVE%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. MT Lotze MA Duncan MD Gerber (1981) ArticleTitleEarly versus delayed shoulder motion following axillary dissection Ann Surg 193 IssueID3 288–295 Occurrence Handle7011221 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi6C2Mbgt10%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. CH Der Horst ParticleVan JA Kenter MT Jong ParticleDe (1985) ArticleTitleShoulder function following early mobilisation of the shoulder after mastectomy and axillary dissection J Surg 37 IssueID4 105–108

    Google Scholar 

  8. JF Rodier MD Gadonneix MD Dauplat (1987) ArticleTitleInfluence of the timing of physiotherapy upon the lymphatic complications of axillary dissection for breast cancer Int Surg 72 166–169 Occurrence Handle3679735 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BieD2MjpvVE%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. I Dawson L Stam JM Heslinga (1989) ArticleTitleEffect of shoulder immobilisation on wound seroma and shoulder dysfunction following modified radical mastectomy: a randomised prospective clinical trial Br J Surg 76 311–312 Occurrence Handle2655815 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiaB2cfjs10%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. L Wingate I Croghan N Natarajan (1989) ArticleTitleRehabilitation of the mastectomy patient: a randomised, blind, prospective study Arch Phys Med Rehabil 70 21–24 Occurrence Handle2916913 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiaC3sznsFc%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. R Jansen A Geel Particlevan H Groot Particlede (1990) ArticleTitleImmediate versus delayed shoulder exercises after axillary lymph node dissection Am J Surg 160 481–484 Occurrence Handle2240381 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6D2M3ht1U%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. JA Petrek MP Peters S Nori (1990) ArticleTitleAxillary lymphadenectomy. A prospective, randomised trial of 13 factors influencing drainage, including early or delayed arm mobilisation Arch Surg 125 378–383 Occurrence Handle2407228 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BC28rntlc%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. CD Knight SuffixJr FD Griffen CD Knight SuffixSr (1995) ArticleTitlePrevention of seromas in mastectomy wounds. The effect of shoulder immobilisation Arch Surg 130 99–101 Occurrence Handle7802586

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. I Schutz M Barholm S Grondal (1997) ArticleTitleDelayed shoulder exercises in reducing seroma frequency after modified radical mastectomy: a prospective randomised study Ann Surg Oncol 4 IssueID4 293–297

    Google Scholar 

  15. D Moher KF Schiltz DG Altman (2001) ArticleTitleThe CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials Lancet 357 1191–1194 Occurrence Handle11323066 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzisFehtQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. M Egger G Davey Smith DG Altman (Eds) (2001) Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context BMJ Publishing company London

    Google Scholar 

  17. R Der Simonian N Laird (1986) ArticleTitleMeta-analysis in clinical trials Control Clin Trials 7 177–188 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiiC3cvisFI%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. KR Bailey (1987) ArticleTitleInter-study differences: how should they influence the interpretation and analysis of results? Stat Med 6 351–358 Occurrence Handle3616288 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiiB1M7kt1M%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. JAC Sterne D Gavaghan M Egger (2001) ArticleTitlePublication and related bias in meta analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature J Clin Epidemiol 53 1119–1129

    Google Scholar 

  20. SG Thompson (2001) Where and how sources of heterogeneity should be investigated M Egger G Davey Smith D Altman (Eds) Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-analysis in Context BMJ Publishing London 157–175

    Google Scholar 

  21. L Brosseau S Balmer M Tousignant (2001) ArticleTitleIntratester and intertester reliability and criterion validity of the parallelogram and universal goniometers for measuring maximum active knee flexion and extension of patients with knee restrictions Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82 IssueID3 396–402 Occurrence Handle11245764 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7pvVKgtA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Delva R. Shamley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shamley, D.R., Barker, K., Simonite, V. et al. Delayed versus immediate exercises following surgery for breast cancer: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 90, 263–271 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-004-4727-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-004-4727-9

Keywords

Navigation