Original Articles
Reduced osmolarity oral rehydration solution for persistent diarrhea in infants: A randomized controlled clinical trial,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1067/mpd.2001.112161Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective: We evaluated and compared the efficacy of the World Health Organization (WHO) oral rehydration solution (ORS) and 2 different formulations of reduced osmolarity ORSs in infants with persistent diarrhea. Study design: Infants with persistent diarrhea (n = 95) were randomized to 1 of the 3 ORSs: WHO-ORS (control, n = 32), a glucose-based reduced osmolarity ORS (RORS-G, n = 30), or a rice-based reduced osmolarity ORS (RORS-R, n = 31) for replacement of ongoing stool losses for up to 7 days. Major outcome measures were stool volume and frequency, ORS intake, and resolution of diarrhea. Results: Although there were variations from one study day to another, the stool volume was approximately 40% less in the reduced osmolarity ORS groups; consequently, these children required less ORS (22% for RORS-G and 27% for RORS-R groups). A higher proportion of children in the RORS-R groups also had resolution of diarrhea during the study period. No children in any of the treatment groups had hyponatremia. Conclusion: Reduced osmolarity ORS is clinically more effective than WHO-ORS and may thus be advantageous for use in the treatment of children with persistent diarrhea. (J Pediatr 2001;138:532-8)

Section snippets

Patients and Methods

The study was conducted at the Clinical Research and Service Centre of the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, between July 1995 and June 1997. Male children (aged 4 to 24 months) who were not grossly malnourished (weight for age >60% of National Center for Health Statistics median) and who had a history of watery diarrhea for >14 days were admitted to the clinical study ward. The presence of and severity of diarrhea were confirmed by observing the children for 24

Results

In total, 118 children were screened for the study and observed for 24 hours; 95 children fulfilled the study criteria (stool output >60 mL/kg) and were assigned to treatment regimens: 32 to WHO-ORS, 30 to RORS-G, and 33 to RORS-R. Two patients in the RORS-R group were withdrawn from the study because of development of acute respiratory tract infection requiring special care on day 2 of the study (Fig 1).

. Treatment profile of study population (n).

The admission characteristics of the 3 treatment

Discussion

The most important observation in our study was the effect on purging, an indicator of absorption efficiency of ORS. The absorption efficiency of RORS was better than that of the WHO-ORS. Although there were variations from one study day to another, the stool volume was approximately 40% less in the RORS groups. Consequently, the children in the RORS groups also required less ORS, and their stool frequency was also less. A higher proportion of children in the RORS groups had resolution of

Acknowledgements

ICDDR, B acknowledges with gratitude the commitment of USAID to the Centre’s efforts. We thank Ms Afia Khatun and Azmira Begum, Dr Rasheduzzaman, and nursing staffs of the Clinical Study Ward of the Clinical Research and Service Centre of ICDDR, B, for their excellent service. We are grateful to Prof D. Sack and Drs ASG Faruque and T. Ahmed for helpful comments on the article.

References (24)

  • D Mahalanabis et al.

    Hypotonic oral rehydration solution in acute diarrhoea: a controlled clinical trial

    Acta Paediatr

    (1995)
  • T Rautanen et al.

    Clinical experiences with a hypotonic oral rehydration solution in acute diarrhoea

    Acta Paediatr

    (1993)
  • Cited by (25)

    • Pathophysiology of Diarrhea and Its Clinical Implications

      2018, Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract, Sixth Edition
    • Pathophysiology of Diarrhea and its Clinical Implications

      2012, Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract, Two Volume Set
    • Pathophysiology of Diarrhea and its Clinical Implications

      2012, Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract
    • Pharmacological Management of Diarrhea

      2010, Gastroenterology Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      An attempt to reduce this complication led to the development of hypo-osmolar solutions. Hypo-osmolar ORT in children with persistent diarrhea reduced stool output by approximately 40% and provided a greater resolution of diarrhea compared with standard ORT.29 Concerns regarding an increased risk of hyponatremia proved to be unfounded.30

    • Management of children with infection-associated persistent diarrhea

      2004, Seminars in Pediatric Infectious Diseases
    • Efficacy and safety of a modified oral rehydration solution (ReSoMaL) in the treatment of severely malnourished children with watery diarrhea

      2003, Journal of Pediatrics
      Citation Excerpt :

      An ORS with sodium concentration reduced to the level contained in ReSoMaL does not seem to be supported by the results of our study. In recent years, there has been growing interest about the use of hypotonic or reduced osmolarity ORS (lower sodium and lower glucose ORS) in the treatment of diarrhea, because some clinical studies have demonstrated better efficacy, especially in reduced need for unscheduled intravenous fluids.21–27 Based on these findings, a WHO/UNICEF expert committee meeting28 recommended a revised formulation of reduced-osmolarity ORS (Na 75, Cl 65, K 20, citrate 20, glucose 75 mosmol/L, osmolarity 245 mosmol/L) for use in children and adults for all causes of diarrhea, including cholera; however, the issue of the best ORS remains controversial, and criticism persists.29,30

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by USAID, Washington, grant No. HRN-A-00-96-90005-00 (under Cooperative Agreement).

    ☆☆

    Reprint requests: Shafiqul A. Sarker, MBBS, MD, Clinical Sciences Division, ICDDR, B, Mohakhali, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh.

    View full text