Regular ArticleWhat constitutes ‘balanced information in the practitioners’ portrayals of Down's syndrome?
References (34)
Down's syndrome: cost, quality and value of life
Social Science and Medicine
(2001)- et al.
An exploration of midwives' and obstetricians' knowledge of genetic screening in pregnancy and their perception of appropriate counseling
Midwifery
(2001) - et al.
Probabilities and health risks: a qualitative approach
Social Science and Medicine
(1998) - et al.
Why women say yes to prenatal diagnosis
Social Science and Medicine
(1997) - et al.
Down's syndrome screening in the UK in 1998
Lancet
(1999) - et al.
Too many choices? Hospital and community staff reflect on the future of prenatal screening
Social Science and Medicine
(2002) - et al.
Is nondirectiveness possible within the context of antenatal screening and testing?
Social Science and Medicine
(2002) - et al.
What parents are told after prenatal diagnosis of a sex chromosome abnormality: interview and questionnaire study
British Medical Journal
(2001) - et al.
Enabling education: experiences in special and ordinary schools
(1998) - Alderson, P, Farsides, B, Williams, C, 2001, Cross currents in genetics and ethics around the millenium – final report,...
Examining ethics in practice: health service professionals' evaluations of in-hospital ethics seminars
Nursing Ethics
(2002)
Attitudes towards termination for fetal abnormality: comparisons in three European countries
Clinical Genetics
(1996)
More training is needed in health care of people with learning disabilities (letter)
British Medical Journal
(2000)
From a different planet: women who choose to continue their pregnancy after a diagnosis of Down's syndrome
The Practising Midwife
(2000)
Eugenics and the new genetics in Britain: examining contemporary professionals' accounts
Public Understanding of Science
(1998)
Cited by (0)
- f1
(Correspondence to: CW E-mail: [email protected])
Copyright © 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.