Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Could we have known? A qualitative analysis of data from women who survived an attempted homicide by an intimate partner

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine in-depth the lives of women whose partners attempted to kill them, and to identify patterns that may aid in the clinician’s ability to predict, prevent, or counsel about femicide or attempted femicide.

DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of 30 in-depth interviews.

SETTING: Six U.S. cities.

PARTICIPANTS: Thirty women, aged 17–54 years, who survived an attempted homicide by an intimate partner.

RESULTS: All but 2 of the participants had previously experienced physical violence, controlling behavior, or both from the partner who attempted to kill them. The intensity of the violence, control, and threats varied greatly, as did the number of risk factors measured by the Danger Assessment, defining a wide spectrum of prior abuse. Approximately half (14/30) of the participants did not recognize that their lives were in danger. Women often focused more on relationship problems involving money, alcohol, drugs, possessiveness, or infidelity, than on the risk to themselves from the violence. The majority of the attempts (22/30) happened around the time of a relationship change, but the relationship was often ending because of problems other than violence.

CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should not be falsely reassured by a woman’s sense of safety, by the lack of a history of severe violence, or by the presence of few classic risk factors for homicide. Efforts to reduce femicide risk that are targeted only at those women seeking help for violence-related problems may miss potential victims.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Russel D. Introduction. In: Radford J, Russell DEH, eds. Femicide: The Politics of Woman Killing. New York: Twayne; 1992:3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell JC, Runyon CW. Femicide: guest editors’ introduction. Homicide Stud. 1998;2:347–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Russell D. Introduction: the politics of femicide. In: Russell D, Harmes RA, eds. Femicide in Global Perspective. New York: Teachers College Press; 2001:3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hoyert DL, Kochanek KD, Murphy SL. Deaths: final data for 1997. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 1999;47:28–37.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grisso JA, Schwartz DF, Hirschinger N, et al. Violent injuries among women in an urban area. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1899–905.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Puzone CA. National trends in intimate partner homicide. United States 1976–95. Violence Against Women. 2000;6:409–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kellermann A, Heron S. Firearms and family violence. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1999;17:699–716, viii.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Greenfeld LA, Rand MR, Craven D, et al. Violence by intimates: Bureau of Justice Statistics Fact-Book Washington, DC: US Department of Justice (Publication NCJ-167237); 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Arbuckle J, Olson L, Howard M, Brillman J, Anctil C, Sklar D. Safe at home? Domestic violence and other homicides among women in New Mexico. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;27:210–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bailey JE, Kellermann AL, Somes GW, Banton JG, Rivara FP, Rushforth NP. Risk factors for violent death of women in the home. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:777–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rennison M, Welchans S. (U.S. Department of Justice). Intimate partner violence. Bureau of Justice Statistics special report; May 2000.

  12. Paulozzi LJ, Saltzman LE, Thompson MP, Holmgreen P. Surveillance for homicide among intimate partners—United States, 1981–98. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2001;50:1–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharps PW, Koziol-McLain J, Campbell J, McFarlane J, Sachs C, Xu X. Health care providers’ missed opportunities for preventing femicide. Prev Med. 2001;33:373–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Moracco KE, Runyon CW, Butts J. Femicide in North Carolina. Homicide Stud. 1998;2:422–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pataki S. State of New York Commission on Domestic Violence Fatalities; 1997.

  16. Campbell JC. Assessing dangerousness: violence by sexual offenders, batterers, and child abusers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Campbell JC, Webster D, Koziol-McLain J, et al. Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: results from a multi-site case control study. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1089–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ryan G, Bernard HR. Data management and analysis methods. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2000:769–802.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Koziol-McLain J, Campbell J, Webster D, Campbell D, Gary F. Femicide risk: reconciling attempted and actual models. Proceedings of the 2001 Annual Meeting of the Homicide Research Work Group, Orlando, FL; 2001.

  20. Campbell JC. ‘If I can’t have you no one can’: power and control in homicide of female partners. In: Radford J, Russel DEH, eds. Femicide: The Politics of Woman Killing. New York: Twayne; 1992:99–113.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Block C, Christakos A. Intimate partner homicide in Chicago over 29 years. Crime Delinq. 1995;41:496–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dutton DG, Browing JJ. Concern for power, fear of intimacy and aversive stimuli for wife abuse. In: Hotaling GT, Finkelhor D, Kirkpatrick JT, Straus MA, eds. Family Abuse and its Consequences: New Directions for Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage 1988;163–75.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mason A, Blankenship V. Power and affiliation, motivation, stress and abuse in intimate relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987;52:203–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nicolaidis C. The voices of survivors: documentary using patient narrative educate physicians about domestic violence. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:117–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. McFarlane JM, Campbell JC, Wilt S, Sachs CJ, Ulrich Y, Xu X. Stalking and intimate partner femicide. Homicide Stud. 1999;3:300–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tjaden P, Thoennes N, on behalf of the US Department of Justice. Stalking in America: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey; 1998.

  27. Campbell JC, Koziol-McLain J, Webster D, et al. Research results from a national study of intimate partner femicide: the danger assessment instrument. NIJ Briefs; 2002.

  28. Weisz A, Tolman R, Saunders DG. Assessing the risk of severe domestic violence. The importance of survivor’s predictions. J Interpers Violence. 2000;15:75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina Nicolaidis MD, MPH.

Additional information

Grant support: This project was funded via a joint grant (R01 DA/AA11156) to Dr. J. Campbell from the National Institutes of Health (NIDA, NIMH, NIA), Center for Disease Control, and the National Institute of Justice. Additional funding was provided by the Collins Foundation to assist in the collection of data from 1 of the 6 cites.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nicolaidis, C., Curry, M.A., Ulrich, Y. et al. Could we have known? A qualitative analysis of data from women who survived an attempted homicide by an intimate partner. J GEN INTERN MED 18, 788–794 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21202.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21202.x

Key words

Navigation