Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Assess impact of a computer-based patient support system on quality of life in younger women with breast cancer, with particular emphasis on assisting the underserved.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial conducted between 1995 and 1998.
SETTING: Five sites: two teaching hospitals (Madison, Wis, and Chicago, Ill), two nonteaching hospitals (Chicago, Ill), and a cancer resource center (Indianapolis, Ind). The latter three sites treat many underserved patients.
PARTICIPANTS: Newly diagnosed breast cancer patients (N=246) under age 60.
INTERVENTIONS: Experimental group received Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System (CHESS), a home-based computer system providing information, decision-making, and emotional support.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pretest and two posttest surveys (at two- and five-month follow-up) measured aspects of participation in care, social/information support, and quality of life. At two-month follow-up, the CHESS group was significantly more competent at seeking information, more comfortable participating in care, and had greater confidence in doctor(s). At five-month follow-up, the CHESS group had significantly better social support and also greater information competence. In addition, experimental assignment interacted with several indicators of medical underservice (race, education, and lack of insurance), such that CHESS benefits were greater for the disadvantaged than the advantaged group.
CONCLUSIONS: Computer-based patient support systems such as CHESS may benefit patients by providing information and social support, and increasing their participation in health care. These benefits may be largest for currently underserved populations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 1999. CA Cancer J Clin. 1999;49(1):8–31.
Meyerowitz BE. Psychosocial correlates of breast cancer and its treatments. Psychol Bull. 1980;87(1):108–31.
Vinokur AD, Threatt BA, Caplan RD, et al. Physical and psychosocial functioning and adjustment to breast cancer: long-term follow-up of a screening population. Cancer. 1989;63:394–405.
Ganz PA, Rowland JH, Desmond K, Meyerowitz BE, Wyatt GE. Life after breast cancer: understanding women’s health-related quality of life and sexual functioning. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:501–14.
Nayfield SG, Ganz PA, Moinpour CM, Cella DF, Hailey BJ. Report from a National Cancer Institute (USA) workshop on quality of life assessment in cancer clinical trials. Qual Life Res. 1992;1:203–10.
Aaronson NK, Meyerowitz BE, Bard M, et al. Quality of life research in oncology: past achievements and future priorities. Cancer. 1991;67(3):839–43.
Chevarley F, White E. Recent trends in breast cancer mortality among white and black U.S. women. Am J Public Health. 1997;87(5):775–81.
Health Services Research Group. Development of the Index of Medical Underservice. Health Services Research. Summer, 1975, 168–80.
Marino C, Gerlach KK. An analysis of breast cancer coverage in selected women’s magazines, 1987–1995. Am J Health Promot. 1999;13(3):163–70.
Scroggins TG Jr, Bartley TK. Enhancing cancer control: assessing cancer knowledge; attitudes and beliefs in disadvantaged communities. J La State Med Soc. 1999;151(4):202–4.
Nelles WB, McCaffrey RJ, Blanchard CG, Ruckdeschel JC. Social support and breast cancer: a review. J Psychosoc Oncol. 1991;9(2):21–34.
Street RL, Voigt B. Patient participation in deciding breast cancer treatment and subsequent quality of life. Med Decis Making. 1997;17:298–306.
Bilodeau BA, Degner LF. Information needs, sources of information, and decisional roles in women with breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996;23(4):691–6.
Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, Boberg E, et al. Impact of a patient-centered, computer-based health information/support system. Am J Prev Med. 1999;16(1):1–9.
Smaglik P, Hawkins R, Pingree S, Gustafson D. The quality of interactive computer use among HIV infected individuals. J Health Communication. 1998;3:53–68.
Boberg E, Gustafson D, Hawkins R, et al. Development, acceptance and use patterns of a computer based education and social support system for people living with AIDS/HIV infection. Comp Hum Behav. 1995;11(2):289–311.
Pingree S, Hawkins RP, Gustafson D, et al. Will the disadvantaged ride the information highway? Hopeful answers from a computer-based health crisis system. J Broadcasting Electronic Media. 1996;40(3):331–53.
Gustafson D, Wise M, McTavish F, et al. Development and pilot evaluation of a computer-based support system for women with breast cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol. 1993;11(4):69–93.
McTavish FM, Gustafson DH, Owens BH, et al. CHESS: an interactive computer system for women with breast cancer piloted with an under-served population. In: Ozbolt JG, ed. Transforming Information, Changing Health Care; Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus; 1994.
Gustafson DH, Taylor JO, Thompson S, Chesney P. Assessing the needs of breast cancer patients and their families. Qual Manage Healthcare. 1993;2(1):6–17.
Love S, Lindsey K. Dr. Susan Love’s Breast Book. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company; 1995.
Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH. The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: Macleod CM, ed. Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents. New York: Columbia University Press; 1949:199–205.
Schag CC, Heinrich RL, Ganz PA. Karnofsky Performance Status revisited: reliability, validity, and guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 1984;2:187–93.
Darlington RB. Regression and Linear Models. New York: McGraw Hill; 1990:263–6.
Ende-Murphy K. The relationship of self-directed learning, self-efficacy, and health value in young women with cancer using a computer health education program. Madison, Wis: University of Wisconsin; 1996. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis.
Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F, et al. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. J Clin Oncol 1997:974–86.
Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, et al. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11(3):570–9.
Fairclough DL, Cella DF. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G): non-response to individual questions. Qual Life Res. 1996;5:321–9.
Cella DF, Bonomi AE, Lloyd SR, et al. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) quality of life instrument. Lung Cancer. 1995;12:199–220.
Moinpour CM, Feigl P, Metch B, Hayden KA, Meyskens FL Jr, Crowley J. Quality of life end points in cancer trials: review and recommendations. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989;81(7):485–95.
Hardy MA. Regression with Dummy Variables. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications Inc; 1993; Sage University Paper Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series No. 07-093.
Cohen J, Cohen P. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 1983.
Seaman MA, Levin JR, Serlin RC. New developments in pairwise multiple comparisons: some powerful and practicable procedures. Psychol Bull. 1991;110:577–86.
Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat. 1979;6:65–70.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 1988.
Demetri GD, Kris M, Wade J, Degos L, Cella D. Quality of life benefit in chemotherapy patients treated with Epoetin Alfa is independent of disease response or tumor type: results from a prospective community oncology study. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(10):3412–25.
Bonomi P, Kim K, Fairclough D, et al. Comparison of survival and quality of life in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with pacilitaxel-cisplatin vs. etoposide-cisplatin: results of an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(3):623–31.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. United States Population Estimates by Age, Sex, Race and Hispanic Origin, 1990–1997. Washington, DC: Population Division, U.S. Bureau of the Census; 1998:20233.
Gustafson D, McTavish F, Hawkins R, et al. Computer support for elderly women with breast cancer: results of a population-based intervention. (Letter) JAMA. 1998;280(15).
CommerceNet/Nielsen. Electronic commerce on the rise according to CommerceNet /Nielsen Media Research Survey. Jan. 7, 1998; http://www.commerce.net/news/press/121 197.html.
Eng T, Maxfield A, Patrick K, Deering M, Ratzan S, Gustafson D. Access to health information and support: a public highway or a private road? JAMA. 1998;280(15):1371–5.
Robinson T, Eng T, Patrick K, Gustafson D. An evidence-based approach to interactive health communication: a challenge to medicine in the information age. JAMA. 1998;280(14):1264–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Cancer Institute under grant #5R01HD32922.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gustafson, D.H., Hawkins, R., Pingree, S. et al. Effect of computer support on younger women with breast cancer. J GEN INTERN MED 16, 435–445 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016007435.x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016007435.x