ArticlesSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes
Introduction
People with type 2 diabetes have to adhere to many self-care responsibilities to achieve optimum glycaemic control. The tasks include: modification of lifestyle, such as diet, exercise, and weight; self-monitoring of blood glucose concentrations; foot care; and administration of oral medication and, increasingly, insulin injections. Difficulties in adhering to these tasks can be associated with suboptimum glycaemic control even in the most intensively managed groups.1 Psychological problems such as depressive disorders2, 3, 4 and eating disorders5, 6 are common and are associated with suboptimum glycaemic control7 and diabetes complications.8
Previous systematic reviews of non-pharmacological interventions did not adequately distinguish between educational and psychological interventions, between type 1 and type 2 diabetes, or between randomised and non-randomised trials.9, 10, 11, 12, 13 The distinction between education and psychological therapy is clinically important because they differ (but are not mutually exclusive) in their theoretical basis, training, clinical skills, and implications for resources. Educational interventions are based on didactic and enhanced learning methods which aim to improve diabetes self-management by increasing knowledge. Psychological therapies use the therapeutic alliance between the patient and the therapist to bring about change in emotional, cognitive, and behavioural functioning, including adherence.14
In view of the rising prevalence of type 2 diabetes,15 a potential limit to pharmacological interventions,1 and effectiveness of psychological therapies for depression16 and eating disorders,17 more sophisticated non-pharmacological approaches are needed. Our aims were to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of psychological therapies in improving glycaemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes and in reducing psychological distress and bodyweight.
Section snippets
Criteria for selecting studies
The protocol was peer reviewed and published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.18 We followed the QUORUM guidelines.19
Studies eligible for inclusion were randomised controlled trials of a psychological intervention, published or unpublished, involving adult (18 years and older) patients with a diagnosis of type 2 or non-insulin-dependent diabetes. We classified the type of psychological intervention into psychotherapeutic models most commonly used in health-care settings. These
Results
The search strategy identified 2427 studies from which 93 full texts were selected for further extraction (figure 1). There was 89·6% agreement as to which abstracts from the electronic databases to select for retrieval of full texts (k=0·64). Data extraction from the full texts identified 25 randomised controlled trials that met the criteria for the systematic review. Reasons for exclusion from the review and meta-analysis are shown in figure 1.
The studies included in the systematic review are
Discussion
We identified 25 randomised controlled trials comparing psychological interventions for improving control of diabetes with a control group of usual care, education, waiting list, or attention control. In a meta-analysis of 12 of these trials, psychological therapies resulted in significantly better glycaemic control approximating to an absolute difference of 0·76% in glycated haemoglobin. When studies that used a less intensive psychological therapy as a comparison were excluded, the pooled
References (59)
- et al.
The course of major depression in diabetes
Gen Hosp Psychiatry
(1997) - et al.
Glycemic control and major depression in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus
J Psychosom Res
(1999) - et al.
for the QUORUM Group. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUORUM statement
Lancet
(1999) - et al.
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?
Control Clin Trials
(1996) - et al.
Comparison of behavioral interventions for control of type II diabetes mellitus
Behav Ther
(1986) Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes
Lancet
(1998)- et al.
Prevalence of depression in adults with diabetes: an epidemiological evaluation
Diabetes Care
(1993) - et al.
Relationship of weight and eating disorders in type 2 diabetic patients: a multicenter study
Int J Eat Disord
(2000) - et al.
A comparison of eating behaviours in newly diagnosed NIDDM patients and case-matched control subjects
Diabetes Care
(1994) - et al.
Depression and poor glycaemic control: a meta-analytic review of the literature
Diabetes Care
(2000)
Association of depression and diabetes complications: a meta-analysis
Psychosom Med
Meta-analysis of diabetes patient education research: variations in intervention effects across studies
Res Nurs Health
Educational and psychosocial interventions for adults with diabetes: report to the British Diabetic Association
Meta-analysis de las intervenciones conductuales en el tratamiento de la diabetes en Espana
Rev Psicol Gral Aplic
Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Diabetes Care
Psychological counselling in problematic diabetes: does it help?
Diabet Med
Psychological treatment in disease and illness
The rising global burden of diabetes and its complications: estimates and projections to the year 2010
Diabet Med
A systematic review of controlled trials of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of brief psychological treatments for depression
Health Technol Asses
Three psychological treatments for bulimia nervosa: a comparative trial
Arch Gen Psychiatry
Psychological interventions for improving glycaemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus (Cochrane Review)
The Cochrane Library, Issue 2
Client centred psychotherapy
Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders
Cognitive-behavior modification: an integrative approach
A study of brief psychotherapy
Interpersonal psychotherapy of depressions
Behavioural and cognitive therapies
Cognitive behaviour therapy for psychiatric problems: a practical guide
Motivational interviewing: preparing people to change addictive behaviour
Cited by (408)
Global comparison of the effect of non-pharmacological interventions on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: A network meta-analysis from 107 randomized controlled trials
2023, Journal of Diabetes and its ComplicationsDiabetes and Mental Health
2023, Canadian Journal of DiabetesSpecial Psychosocial Issues in Diabetes Management: Diabetes Distress, Disordered Eating, and Depression
2022, Primary Care - Clinics in Office PracticeIs there a Relation between Depression and Anxiety to Clinical Characteristics among Patients with T2D in Greece?
2024, Current Diabetes Reviews