Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 358, Issue 9285, 15 September 2001, Pages 876-880
The Lancet

Articles
Effects of preoperative warming on the incidence of wound infection after clean surgery: a randomised controlled trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06071-8Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Wound infection after clean surgery is an expensive and often underestimated cause of patient morbidity, and the benefits of using prophylactic antibiotics have not been proven. Warming patients during colorectal surgery has been shown to reduce infection rates. We aimed to assess whether warming patients before short duration, clean surgery would have the same effect.

Methods

421 patients having clean (breast, varicose vein, or hernia) surgery were randomly assigned to either a non- warmed (standard) group or one of two warmed groups (local and systemic). We applied warming for at least 30 min before surgery. Patients were followed up and masked outcome assessments made at 2 and 6 weeks.

Finding

Analysis was done on an intention-to-treat basis. We identified 19 wound infections in 139 non-warmed patients (14%) but only 13 in 277 who received warming (5%; p=0·001). Wound scores were also significantly lower (p=0·007) in warmed patients. There was no significant difference in the development of haematomas or seromas after surgery but the non-warmed group were prescribed significantly more postoperative antibiotics (p=0·002)

Interpretation

Warming patients before clean surgery seems to aid the prevention of postoperative wound infection. If applied according to the manufacturers guidelines these therapies have no known side-effects and might, with the support of further studies, provide an alternative to prophylactic antibiotics in this type of surgery.

Introduction

Wound infection remains one of the most common causes of morbidity in the surgical patient despite advances in surgical practice and the widespread use of prophylactic antibiotics. The average cost of a surgical wound infection has proved difficult to estimate,1 but hospital costs alone may be over £1500 per patient.2, 3 The costs of treatment after discharge from hospital, where most wound infections are now diagnosed,4, 5, 6 or the cost to the patient in prescription charges, loss of earnings and a reduced quality of life, are rarely taken into account.

Clean surgery is defined as uninfected, operative surgery, where no inflammation is encountered and the respiratory, alimentary, and genitourinary tracts are not opened.7 The importance of infection rates in clean surgery should not be underestimated as they might be seen as an indicator of quality and used to determine surgical performance.8, 9

Most studies suggest that the infection rate in clean surgery is 5% or lower.4, 10, 11, 12, 13 However, other studies have shown that if patients are followed up intensely for 6 weeks after surgery, and the definition of infection is not solely limited to the presence of a purulent discharge, then infection rates might be nearer 10%.6, 8, 14

Many factors have been shown to reduce the incidence of surgical wound infection, most of which are now part of best practice. The value of prophylactic antibiotics in clean-contaminated and contaminated surgery is not contentious but the benefits of prophylactic antibiotics in reducing wound infection rates after clean surgery remain unclear. Although it has been suggested that antibiotics are beneficial15 this idea has not been supported by other studies.14, 16

Animal and human studies have shown that intraoperative hypothermia increases the risk of wound infection.17, 18, 19 Intraoperative hypothermia is likely to cause a reduction in peripheral circulation, which may increase tissue hypoxia and make the wound more susceptible to infection, even if contamination levels are low. The process of warming using a warm air blanket, to prevent hypothermia, is becoming common practice for most major surgery but the benefits of warming during clean surgical procedures, where surgery usually lasts less than an hour.

An alternative may be to warm patients before short duration, usually day case, surgery. We aimed to assess the use of a local warming device and a warm air blanket for the reduction of infection after clean wound surgery.

Section snippets

Patients and methods

We did a randomised controlled trial to investigate the effects of preoperative warming using a local warming device and a warm air blanket on postoperative wound infection rates after clean surgery. We obtained local research ethics committee approval and informed consent from all patients. All data collection took place within the same district general hospital.

Results

From April, 1999, to May, 2000, 421 patients were recruited into the study (figure). One patient randomly assigned to local warming had his operation cancelled and four patients (two local warming and two standard) were lost to follow-up, leaving 416 patient data sets for further analysis.

139 patients received standard treatment, 138 received local warming, and 139 received systemic warming. Nine protocol violations occurred, all in the warming groups. These were mainly due to logistical

Discussion

All surgical patients are at risk of a wound infection and this risk increases if tissue perfusion is poor after surgery.23 We have shown that a 30 min period of warming, before surgery, reduces infection rates from 14% to 5%. The length of surgery was short and core temperatures in the recovery room do not suggest that patients were hypothermic However, due to the whole surgical episode of preoperative anxiety, prolonged fasting, anaesthetic drugs, and surgery our patients are still likely to

References (27)

  • NJ Keeling et al.

    Inpatient and post-discharge wound infections in general surgery

    Ann R Coll Surg Engl

    (1995)
  • Post-operative wound infections: factors influencing the incidence of wound infections

    Ann Surg

    (1964)
  • IS Bailey et al.

    Community surveillance of complications after hernia repair

    BMJ

    (1992)
  • Cited by (546)

    • Surgical site infections

      2023, Surgery (United Kingdom)
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text