ReviewsNatural history of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis☆
Section snippets
Data sources
All studies in which women with cervical smears showing squamous atypia or worse were observed for a minimum of 6 months before treatment were initially eligible for inclusion. A MEDLINE search of the English language medical literature was conducted for the years 1966 to 1996, using the medical subject headings cervix neoplasms, vaginal neoplasms, vaginal smears, atypia, cervix dysplasia, cervix carcinoma, colposcopy, patient follow-up, and natural history. Searches of the Federal Research in
Study selection
After initial identification of potentially relevant studies, all studies were reviewed in detail by one of the authors (J.M. or J.N.), and additional exclusion criteria were applied. Because our inquiry focused on the natural history of cervical intraepithelial lesions (and not on the effect of current treatment), no initial limitation was placed on the age of the studies reviewed. However, after review and attempted stratification of cytologic classifications used, studies published before
Data extraction and analysis
Eligible studies were abstracted by two of the authors (J.M. and J.N.), according to a predetermined data extraction format. Key variables included entry cytology results, follow-up time, whether biopsy was performed, and outcomes, expressed as cytologic results, colposcopy findings, or pathologic results from cervical biopsy, cone biopsy, or (rarely) hysterectomy. When mean or median follow-up time for the study group was not reported directly, it was estimated as half the total follow-up time
Tabulation, integration, and results
We initially screened 301 studies for inclusion in the analysis; 229 did not report 6 months’ follow-up. Nine additional references were identified through review of references and contacts with experts, resulting in 81 total studies for review. Forty-seven reports were excluded after secondary review: 18 had unclear reporting of outcomes or inability to relate entry cytologic finding to outcome (cytology, colposcopy, or pathology); 12 did not meet the minimum requirement of 6 months’
Discussion
Although reviews on the natural history of untreated cervical dysplasia have been published previously,59, 60 ours is the first to our knowledge, based on our literature review, to apply the techniques of meta-analysis to the English language literature on this topic. Studies of women whose cervical smears showed squamous atypia or worse and who were observed for a minimum of 6 months were identified by a search of MEDLINE from 1966 to 1996, Current Contents, the Federal Research in Progress
References (65)
- et al.
Management of the mildly abnormal Pap smeara conservative approach
Gynecol Oncol
(1985) - et al.
Mild cervical dyskaryosissafety of cytological surveillance
Lancet
(1992) Management of the patient with an abnormal Papanicolaou test. Recent developments
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am
(1993)Natural history of cervical neoplasiaoverview and update
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1996)- et al.
Progressive potential of mild cervical atypiaprospective cytological, colposcopic, and virological study
Lancet
(1986) - et al.
Women with positive cervical smears but without surgical intervention. A follow-up study
Lancet
(1978) - et al.
The significance of basal-cell hyperactivity in cervical biopsies
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1955) - et al.
Dysplasia of the cervixa prospective study of 206 cases
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1968) Cytologic and histologic outcome following an atypical cervical smear
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1968)- et al.
Carcinoma in situ of the cervix and related lesions
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1964)
Spontaneous course of cervical precancerous conditions
Am J Obstet Gynecol
The fate of cervical dysplasia
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Conservative treatment of mild/moderate cervical dyskaryosislong-term outcome
Lancet
Uterine cervical cytology and young women
Lancet
Understanding prognosis to improve rehabilitationthe example of lateral elbow pain
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
Controlled Clin Trials
Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysisIs there a Tower of Babel bias?
J Clin Epidemiol
Screening for cervical cancer
The Papanicolaou test for cervical cancer detection. A triumph and a tragedy
JAMA
Healthy people 2000 at mid decade
JAMA
Prevalence of dysplasia and cancer of the cervix in a nationwide, planned parenthood population
Cancer
Results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, October 31, 1991–September 30, 1993
MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep
Interim guidelines for management of abnormal cervical cytology. The 1992 National Cancer Institute Workshop
JAMA
Report of a national workshop on screening for cancer of the cervix
Can Med Assoc J
Cervical cytology: evaluation and management of abnormalities. ACOG technical bulletin no. 183
Management choices for patients with “squamous atypia” on Papanicolaou smear. A toss up?
Med Care
Mild cervical cytological abnormalities
BMJ
Controversies in the management of low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
Cancer
Comparative utility of repeat Papanicolaou smears, cervicography, and colposcopy in the evaluation of atypical Papanicolaou smears
Obstet Gynecol
Every woman with an abnormal cervical smear should be referred for treatmentdebate
Clin Obstet Gynecol
Management of initial atypical cervical cytologya randomized, prospective study
Obstet Gynecol
Long term follow up of women with borderline cervical smear test resultseffects of age and viral infection on progression to high grade dyskaryosis
BMJ
Cited by (387)
Pathology of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis: Back to Square One
2024, Urologic Clinics of North AmericaInteraction of microbiota, mucosal malignancies, and immunotherapy—Mechanistic insights
2024, Mucosal ImmunologyPredictors factors of the absence of high-grade intraepithelial lesion in excisional therapy specimen
2023, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human ReproductionAutomated Cervical Digitized Histology Whole-Slide Image Analysis Toolbox
2021, Journal of Pathology InformaticsPresence of 10 transformation zone cells in endocervical curettage should not be required for adequacy
2024, American Journal of Clinical Pathology
- ☆
This study was funded by grant R01-CA70104-0 from the National Cancer Institute.