Cesarean birth: How to reduce the rate☆
References (37)
- et al.
The Green Bay cesarean section study, I: the physician factor as a determinant of cesarean birth rates
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1990) - et al.
The Green Bay cesarean section study, II: the physician factor as a determinant of cesarean birth rates for failed labor
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1992) - et al.
The Green Bay cesarean section study, III: falling cesarean birth rates without a formal curtailment program
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1994) - et al.
Reducing cesarean births at a primarily private university hospital
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1993) - et al.
Reducing cesarean sections at a teaching hospital
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1990) - et al.
Cesarean section delivery in the 1980s: international comparison by indication
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1994) - et al.
The contribution of dystocia to the cesarean section rate
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1994) - et al.
Vaginal birth after cesarean births or repeat cesarean: medical risks or social realities
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1990) - et al.
Uterine rupture after previous cesarean delivery: maternal and fetal consequences
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1993) National Institutes of Health consensus development conference on cesarean childbirth
Cesarean section rates in the United States: the short-term failure of the national consensus development conference in 1980
JAMA
1989 U.S. cesarean section rate steadies—VBAC rate rises to nearly one in five
Birth
Rates of Cesarean delivery—United States, 1991
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
Unnecessary cesarean sections; curing a national epidemic
Unnecessary cesarean sections: curing a national epidemic
Healthy peopel 2000: national health promotion and disease prevention objectives
Relationship between malpractice claims and cesarean delivery
JAMA
Cited by (77)
Quality assessment of the Portuguese public hospitals: A multiple criteria approach
2021, Omega (United Kingdom)Citation Excerpt :At this point, attention should be paid to cesarean sections. There is an increasing worldwide need to reduce this kind of deliveries [38]. refer that sections’ cesarean rates should be mitigated, especially in the categories of prior cesarean delivery and dystocia (obstructed labor).
Examining Caesarean Section Rates in Canada Using the Robson Classification System
2013, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology CanadaCitation Excerpt :Data source: Provincial Perinatal Database Systems In the first half of the 20th century, a woman who had a CS was likely also to deliver by CS in subsequent pregnancies.22 Currently, the rate of CS is many times higher among women who have had a previous CS (Table 4, Robson Group 5), and this group makes a substantial contribution to the overall rate of CS.13,20,21
Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: Early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review
2012, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyPharmaco-economic aspects of perioperative pain management
2012, Annales Francaises d'Anesthesie et de ReanimationPregnancy with Friedreich ataxia: A retrospective review of medical risks and psychosocial implications
2010, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyWhat type of delivery for twins?
2010, Revue Sage - Femme
- ☆
Presented at the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Pacific Coast Obstetrical and Gynecological Society, Scottsdale, Arizona, October 24–29, 1994.