Skip to main content
Log in

When should decision-analytic modeling be used in the economic evaluation of health care?

  • Editorial
  • Published:
The European Journal of Health Economics, formerly: HEPAC Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Weinstein MC, Stason WB (1977) Foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis for health and medical practices. N Engl J Med 296:716–721

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Raiffa H (1968) Decision analysis: introductory lectures on choices under uncertainty, 1st edn. Addison Wesley: Reading

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pauker SG, Kassirer JP (1975) Therapeutic decision making: a cost-benefit analysis. N Engl J Med 293:229–234

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Weinstein MC, Fineberg HV, Elstein AS et al. (1980) Clinical decision analysis, 1st edn. Saunders: Philadelphia

  5. Keeney RL (1982) Decision analysis: an overview. Operations Res 30:803–838

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kassirer JP, Moskowitz AJ, Lau J, Pauker SG (1987) Decision analysis: a progress report. Ann Intern Med 106:275–291

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sox H, Blatt MA, Higgins MC, Marton KI (1988) Medical decision making. Butterworths: Boston

  8. Chapman GB, Sonnenberg FA (2000) Decision making in health care: theory, psychology, and applications. Cambridge Series on Judgment and Decision Making. Cambridge University Press: New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hunink MG, Glasziou PP, Siegel JE et al. (2001) Decision making in health and medicine. Integrating evidence and values. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buxton MJ, Drummond MF, Van Hout BA et al. (1997) Modelling in economic evaluation: an unavoidable fact of life. Health Econ 6:217–227

    Google Scholar 

  11. Weinstein MC, Toy EL, Sandberg EA et al. (2001) Modeling for health care and other policy decisions: uses, roles, and validity. Value Health 4:348–361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sheldon TA (1996) Problems of using modelling in the economic evaluation of health care. Health Econ 5:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weinstein MC, O'Brien B, Hornberger J et al. (2003) Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in health-care evaluation: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices-Modeling Studies. Value Health 6:9–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. National Research Council (1991) Improving information for social policy decisions: the uses of microsimulation modelling, vol 1. National Academy Press: Washington

    Google Scholar 

  15. Box GEP, Hunter WG, Hunter JS (1978) Statistics for experimenters: an introduction to design, data analysis, and model building. Wiley: New York

  16. Eddy DM (1990) Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Designing a practice policy. Standards, guidelines and options. JAMA 263:3077

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Richardson WS, Detsky AS (1995) Users' guides to the medical literature. VII. How to use a clinical decision analysis. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 273:1292–1295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Drummond MF, O'Brien B, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW (1997) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press: New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Beck JR, Pauker SG (1983) The Markov process in medical prognosis. Med Decis Making 3:419–458

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sonnenberg FA, Beck JR (1993) Markov models in medical decision making: a practical guide. Med Decis Making 13:322–338

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Anderson RM, May RM (1991) Infectious diseases of humans: dynamics and control. Oxford University Press: New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC (1996) Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford University Press: New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tengs TO, Adams ME, Pliskin JS et al. (1995) Five-hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness. Risk Anal 15:369–390

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Deuffic S, Buffat L, Poynard T, Valleron AJ (1999) Modeling the hepatitis C virus epidemic in France. Hepatology 29:1596–1601

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wong JB, McQuillan GM, McHutchison JG, Poynard T (2000) Estimating future hepatitis C morbidity, mortality, and costs in the United States. Am J Public Health 90:1562–1569

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Salomon JA, Weinstein MC, Hammitt JK, Goldie SJ (2002) Empirically calibrated model of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 156:761–773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Freeman AJ, Law MG, Kaldor JM, Dore GJ (2003) Predicting progression to cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis C virus infection. J Viral Hepat 10:285–293

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Manns MP, McHutchison JG, Gordon SC et al. (2001) Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a randomised trial. Lancet 358 958–965

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fried M, Shiffman M, Reddy R et al. (2002) Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med 347:975–982

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Krahn MD, Mahoney JE, Eckman MH et al. (1994) Screening for prostate cancer. A decision analytic view. JAMA 272:773–780

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Coley CM, Barry MJ, Fleming C et al. (1997) Early detection of prostate cancer. II. Estimating the risks, benefits, and costs. Ann Intern Med 126:468–479

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Harris R, Lohr KN (2002) Screening for prostate cancer: an update of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 137:917–929

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Neumann PJ, Hermann RC, Kuntz KM et al. (1999) Cost-effectiveness of donepezil in the treatment of mild or moderate Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 52:1138–1145

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rogers SL, Farlow MR, Doody RS et al. (1998) A 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Donepezil Study Group. Neurology 50:136–145

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Greiner W, Schöffski O, Graf von der Schulenburg JM (2000) Transferability of international results on national research questions (in German). In: Schöffski O, Graf von der Schulenburg JM (eds) Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluationen, 2nd edn. Springer: Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 403–420

  36. Graham DY, Agrawal NM, Roth SH (1988) Prevention of NSAID-induced gastric ulcer with misoprostol: multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet II 1277–1280

  37. Hillman AL, Bloom BS (1989) Economic effects of prophylactic use of misoprostol to prevent gastric ulcer in patients taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Arch Intern Med 149:2061–2065

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Baltussen R, Ament A, Leidl R (1996) Making cost assessments based on RCTs more useful to decision-makers. Health Policy 37:163–183

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Baltussen R, Leidl R, Ament A (1996) The impact of age on cost-effectiveness ratios and its control in decision making. Health Econ 5:227–239

    Google Scholar 

  40. Leidl R, von der Schulenburg J-M, Wasem J (1999) Approaches and methods of economic evaluation-an international perspective (in German). Health Technology Assessment, vol 9. Nomos: Baden-Baden

  41. Bennett WG, Inoue Y, Beck JR et al. (1997) Estimates of the cost-effectiveness of a single course of interferon-alpha 2b in patients with histologically mild chronic hepatitis C. Ann Intern Med 127:855–865

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wong JB, Poynard T, Ling MH et al. (2000) Cost-effectiveness of 24 or 48 weeks of interferon alpha-2b alone or with ribavirin as initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C. International Hepatitis Interventional Therapy Group. Am J Gastroenterol 95:1524–1530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sennfält K, Reichard O, Hultkrantz R et al. (2001) Cost-effectiveness of interferon alfa-2b with and without ribavirin as therapy for chronic hepatitis C in Sweden. Scand J Gastroenterol 36:870–876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sagmeister M, Wong JB, Mullhaupt B, Renner EL (2001) A pragmatic and cost-effective strategy of a combination therapy of interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 13:483–488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Stein K, Rosenberg W, Wong J (2002) Cost effectiveness of combination therapy for hepatitis C: a decision analytic model. Gut 50:253–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wong JB, Nevens F (2002) Cost-effectiveness of peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared to interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin as initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Belgium. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 65:110–111

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Siebert U, Sroczynski G, Rossol S et al. (2003) Cost effectiveness of peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin versus interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Gut 52:425–432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Buti M, Medina M, Casado MA et al. (2003) A cost-effectiveness analysis of peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for the treatment of naive patients with chronic hepatitis C. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 17:687–694

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment (1997) Guidelines for economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals, 2nd edn. CCOHTA: Ottawa

  50. Schulenburg JM Graf von der, Hoffmann C (2000) Review of European guidelines for economic evaluation of medical technologies and pharmaceuticals. Eur J Health Econ 1:2–8

    Google Scholar 

  51. Mason J, Drummond MF, Torrance G (1993) Some guidelines on the use of cost effectiveness league tables. BMJ 306:570–572

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Pauker SP, Pauker SG (1987) The amniocentesis decision: ten years of decision analytic experience. Birth defects. Original Article Series 23:151–169

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Pauker SP, Pauker SG (1979) The amniocentesis decision: an explicit guide for parents. Birth defects. Original Article Series 15:289–324

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Krahn MD, Mahoney JE, Eckman MH et al. (1994) Screening for prostate cancer. A decision analytic view. JAMA 272:773–780

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sonnenberg A, Delco F (2002) Cost-effectiveness of a single colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer. Arch Intern Med 162:163–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Eddy DM (1987) The frequency of cervical cancer screening. Comparison of a mathematical model with empirical data. Cancer 60:1117–22

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Goldie SJ, Kuhn L, Denny L et al. (2001) Policy analysis of cervical cancer screening strategies in low-resource settings: clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness. JAMA 285:3107–3115 (erratum appears in 286:1026)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Bech GJ, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH et al. (2001) Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial. Circulation 103:2928–2934

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kuntz KM, Fleischmann KE, Hunink MGM, Douglas PS (1999) Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for patients with chest pain. Ann Intern Med 130:709–718

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. McHutchison JG, Manns M, Patel K et al. (2002) Adherence to combination therapy enhances sustained response in genotype-1-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology 123:1061–1089

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Claxton K, Neumann PJ, Araki S, Weinstein MC (2001) Bayesian value-of-information analysis. An application to a policy model of Alzheimer's disease. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 17:38–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Weinstein MC, Coxson PG, Williams LW et al. (1987) Forecasting coronary heart disease incidence, mortality, and cost: the Coronary Heart Disease Policy Model. Am J Public Health 77:1417–1426

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Goldman L, Weinstein MC, Williams LW (1989) Relative impact of targeted versus populationwide cholesterol interventions on the incidence of coronary heart disease. Projections of the Coronary Heart Disease Policy Model. Circulation 80:254–260

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Edelson JT, Weinstein MC, Tosteson AN et al. (1990) Long-term cost-effectiveness of various initial monotherapies for mild to moderate hypertension. JAMA 263:407–413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Goldman L, Weinstein MC, Goldman PA, Williams LW (1991) Cost-effectiveness of HMG-CoA reductase inhibition for primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. JAMA 265:1145–1151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Tsevat J, Weinstein MC, Williams LW et al. (1991) Expected gains in life expectancy from various coronary heart disease risk factor modifications. Circulation 83:1194–1201

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Hunink MG, Goldman L, Tosteson AN et al. (1997) The recent decline in mortality from coronary heart disease, 1980–1990. The effect of secular trends in risk factors and treatment. JAMA 277:535–542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Tosteson AN, Weinstein MC, Hunink MG et al. (1997) Cost-effectiveness of populationwide educational approaches to reduce serum cholesterol levels. Circulation 95:24–30

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Goldman L, Coxson P, Hunink MG et al. (1999) The relative influence of secondary versus primary prevention using the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel II guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 34:768–776

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Prosser LA, Stinnett AA, Goldman PA et al. (2000) Cost-effectiveness of cholesterol-lowering therapies according to selected patient characteristics. Ann Intern Med 132:769–779

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Phillips KA, Shlipak MG, Coxson P et al. (2000) Health and economic benefits of increased beta-blocker use following myocardial infarction. JAMA 284:2748–2754

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Goldman L, Phillips KA, Coxson P et al. (2001) The effect of risk factor reductions between 1981 and 1990 on coronary heart disease incidence, prevalence, mortality and cost. J Am Coll Cardiol 38:1012–1017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Tice JA, Ross E, Coxson PG et al. (2001) Cost-effectiveness of vitamin therapy to lower plasma homocysteine levels for the prevention of coronary heart disease: effect of grain fortification and beyond. JAMA 286:936–943

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Tsevat J (1992) Impact and cost-effectiveness of smoking interventions. Am J Med 93:43S–47S

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Goldman L, Gordon DJ, Rifkind BM et al. (1992) Cost and health implications of cholesterol lowering. Circulation 85:1960–1968

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Tosteson AN, Weinstein MC, Williams LW, Goldman L (1990) Long-term impact of smoking cessation on the incidence of coronary heart disease. Am J Public Health 80:1481–1486

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Goldman L, Goldman PA, Williams LW, Weinstein MC (1993) Cost-effectiveness considerations in the treatment of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia with medications. Am J Cardiol 72:75D–79D

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Stinnett A, Mittleman A, Weinstein M et al. (1996) The cost-effectiveness of dietary and pharmacologic therapy for cholesterol reduction in adults. In: Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC (eds) Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine: report on the panel of cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford University Press: New York, 349–391

    Google Scholar 

  79. Anonymous (1993) Summary of the second report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel II). JAMA 269:3015–3023

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Tengs TO, Osgood ND, Lin TH (2001) Public health impact of changes in smoking behavior: results from the Tobacco Policy Model. Med Care 39:1131–1141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Tengs TO, Osgood ND, Chen LL (2001) The cost-effectiveness of intensive national school-based anti-tobacco education: results from the tobacco policy model. Prev Med 33:558–570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Perleth M, Busse R (2000) Health technology assessment in Germany. Status, challenges, and development. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 16:412–428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Sassi F (2000) The European way to health technology assessment. Lessons from an evaluation of EUR-ASSESS. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 16:282–290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Russell LB, Gold MR, Siegel JE et al. (1996) The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA 276:1172–1177

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Marckmann G, Siebert U (2002) Kosteneffektivität als Allokationskriterium in der Gesundheitsversorgung. Z Med Ethik 48:171–190

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uwe Siebert MDH, MPH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siebert, U. When should decision-analytic modeling be used in the economic evaluation of health care?. HEPAC 4, 143–150 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-003-0205-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-003-0205-2

Navigation