Evid Based Nurs doi:10.1136/eb-2012-101158
  • Primary health care
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis

General health checks may not reduce morbidity or mortality but do increase the number of new diagnoses

  1. Ricky Banarsee2
  1. 1Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
  2. 2Department of Public Health, NHS Brent, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to: Professor Azeem Majeed
    Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, Reynolds Building, London W6 8RP, UK; a.majeed{at}

Commentary on:

Implications for practice and research

  • General health checks aim to detect risk factors and diseases in healthy people, with the aim of either preventing a disease from developing, or treating a disease earlier in its course.

  • A systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of general health checks found that they did not reduce morbidity or mortality, but did increase the number of new diagnoses.


The burden of non-communicable disease such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and kidney disease is increasing worldwide.1 These diseases all share risk factors that include smoking, hypertension, obesity, physical inactivity and hyperglycaemia. Their prevention, early identification and effective management could have major public health and economic benefits, and this has led to renewed interest …

Articles citing this article

No Related Web Pages

Free Sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EBN.
View free sample issue >>

EBN Journal Chat

The EBN Journal Chat offers readers the opportunity to participate in discussion about research articles and commentaries from Evidence Based Nursing (EBN).

How to participate >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Navigate This Article