rss
Evid Based Nurs 9:111 doi:10.1136/ebn.9.4.111
  • Treatment

Acupuncture was better than no acupuncture but did not differ from minimal (sham) acupuncture for chronic low back pain at 8 weeks


 
 Q In patients with chronic low back pain, is acupuncture better than minimal (sham) or no acupuncture for reducing pain?

METHODS

GraphicDesign:

randomised controlled trial (Acupuncture Randomised Trial in Low Back Pain).

GraphicAllocation:

concealed.

GraphicBlinding:

blinded (patients who received acupuncture and minimal acupuncture).

GraphicFollow up period:

8 weeks.

GraphicSetting:

30 private practices and hospital outpatient units in Germany.

GraphicPatients:

301 patients 40–75 years of age (mean age 59 y, 68% women) who had chronic low back pain for >6 months, mean pain intensity ⩾40 on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) in the previous 7 days, and used only oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the 4 weeks before treatment. Exclusion criteria were protrusion or prolapse of ⩾1 intervertebral disc and neurological symptoms; radicular pain; previous vertebral column surgery; infectious spondylopathy; spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis; low back pain caused by inflammatory, malignant, or autoimmune disease; congenital spine deformities; compression fracture caused by osteoporosis; spinal stenosis; …

No Related Web Pages

Free Sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EBN.
View free sample issue >>

EBN Journal Chat

The EBN Journal Chat offers readers the opportunity to participate in discussion about research articles and commentaries from Evidence Based Nursing (EBN).

How to participate >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Navigate This Article