Article Text

PDF

Review: early supported discharge reduces death or dependence after stroke
  1. David Stevenson, RGN, MSc
  1. Harrogate Health Care NHS Trust
 Harrogate, North Yorkshire, UK
    • cerebrovascular accident
    • home care services (hospital based)
    • length of stay
    • patient discharge

    
 
 Q In patients admitted to hospital with stroke, does an early supported discharge (ESD) service with rehabilitation at home provide better outcomes than conventional in-hospital care?

    METHODS

    GraphicData sources:

    the Cochrane Specialised Register of Controlled Trials (to August 2004) was searched and trialists were asked to describe their intervention and control services and to provide individual patient data.

    GraphicStudy selection and assessment:

    randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared an ESD intervention with conventional care in patients admitted to hospital with stroke. The aim of ESD was to accelerate discharge from hospital and provide rehabilitation and regular assistance in a community setting. Quality assessment of individual trials was based on allocation concealment and blinding of outcome assessors.

    GraphicOutcomes:

    a composite endpoint of death or dependence (Barthel index <19/20 or Rankin score >2). Secondary outcomes were death; death or need for long term institutional care; change in activities of daily living (ADL), subjective health status, or mood or depression; patient satisfaction; caregiver outcomes (subjective health status, mood score, and satisfaction); and resource outcomes (length of stay and hospital readmission).

    MAIN RESULTS

    11 RCTs (n = 1597, mean or median age range 68–78 y) met the selection criteria. The trials were done in Australia, Canada, Norway, Sweden, Thailand, and the UK. Median follow up was 6 months (range 3–12 mo). 9 RCTs used a concealed randomisation procedure, and 10 RCTs used blinded outcome assessment. The same ESD team coordinated hospital discharge and rehabilitation at home in 7 RCTs; the ESD team coordinated discharge home and immediate post-discharge care but not rehabilitation care in 2 RCTs; and patients received multidisciplinary care in hospital, but post-discharge care was provided by uncoordinated community services or healthcare volunteers in 2 RCTs. Patients who received ESD had greater reductions in death or dependence than patients who received conventional care (table). Groups did not differ for death, but the composite endpoint of death or need for long term institutional care was reduced with ESD (table). Groups did not differ for ADL, subjective health status, or mood scores. Patients who received ESD were more likely to report satisfaction with outpatient services (odds ratio 1.6, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.4) (5 RCTs). Caregivers’ outcomes did not differ between groups. Length of hospital stay was 7.7 days (CI 4.2 to 10.7) shorter in the ESD group (9 RCTs). Hospital readmission rates were similar between groups (27% v 25%) (5 RCTs). Significant subgroup interaction existed with the presence or absence of coordinated, multidisciplinary ESD teams. ESD was more effective in patients with moderate than with severe stroke.

    CONCLUSION

    In patients admitted to hospital with stroke, an early supported discharge service with rehabilitation at home reduces death and disability more than conventional in-hospital care.

    Commentary

    The benefits of organised stroke services have been clearly shown in previous reviews.1 ESD is an approach common to many stroke services, and the rigorous and comprehensive meta-analysis by Langhorne et al can further inform both the design and delivery of services. The benefit of ESD shown in this review does not depend on whether organised stroke unit care is used as a comparison.

    Langhorne et al examined the composition of ESD teams within the trials and found a minimal role for nurses: the median number of nurses on ESD teams in the 11 included trials was 0. It would be interesting to establish whether this is typical of other ESD teams, as it brings into question the wider contribution of nursing to the patient rehabilitation process. The 11 trials were from 6 countries, and the role of nurses in the rehabilitation process may vary internationally.

    The conclusion of Langhorne et al highlights the potential benefits of “appropriately resourced and coordinated services.” This important point should not be lost on those seeking to develop ESD services. The subgroup analysis also shows that ESD services benefit patients with moderate stroke but may be less suitable for those with severe stroke.

    For nurses, this individual patient data meta-analysis indicates the patients most appropriately referred for ESD, whilst also questioning the role of nurses in existing ESD services. Perhaps it serves to highlight that services are most effective when tailored to meet patient needs. Similar to many trials of nurse led care, the professional background of those delivering care seems less important than adequate provision of organisational resources and training.

    References

    Early supported discharge (ESD) v conventional in-hospital care for stroke*

    
 
 Q In patients admitted to hospital with stroke, does an early supported discharge (ESD) service with rehabilitation at home provide better outcomes than conventional in-hospital care?

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    
 
 Q In patients admitted to hospital with stroke, does an early supported discharge (ESD) service with rehabilitation at home provide better outcomes than conventional in-hospital care?

    METHODS

    Embedded ImageData sources:

    the Cochrane Specialised Register of Controlled Trials (to August 2004) was searched and trialists were asked to describe their intervention and control services and to provide individual patient data.

    Embedded ImageStudy selection and assessment:

    randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared an ESD intervention with conventional care in patients admitted to hospital with stroke. The aim of ESD was to accelerate discharge from hospital and provide rehabilitation and regular assistance in a community setting. Quality assessment of individual trials was based on allocation concealment and blinding of outcome assessors.

    Embedded ImageOutcomes:

    a composite endpoint of death or dependence (Barthel index <19/20 or Rankin score >2). Secondary outcomes were death; death or need for long term institutional care; change in activities of daily living (ADL), subjective health status, or mood or depression; patient satisfaction; caregiver outcomes (subjective health status, mood score, and satisfaction); and resource outcomes (length of stay and hospital readmission).

    MAIN RESULTS

    11 RCTs (n = 1597, mean or median age range 68–78 y) met the selection criteria. The trials were done in Australia, Canada, Norway, Sweden, Thailand, and the UK. Median follow up was 6 months (range 3–12 mo). 9 RCTs used a concealed randomisation procedure, and 10 RCTs used blinded outcome assessment. The same ESD team coordinated hospital discharge and rehabilitation at home in 7 RCTs; the ESD team coordinated discharge home and immediate post-discharge care but not rehabilitation care in 2 RCTs; and patients received multidisciplinary care in hospital, but post-discharge care was provided by uncoordinated community services or healthcare volunteers in 2 RCTs. Patients who received ESD had greater reductions in death or dependence than patients who received conventional care (table). Groups did not differ for death, but the composite endpoint of death or need for long term institutional care was reduced with ESD (table). Groups did not differ for ADL, subjective health status, or mood scores. Patients who received ESD were more likely to report satisfaction with outpatient services (odds ratio 1.6, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.4) (5 RCTs). Caregivers’ outcomes did not differ between groups. Length of hospital stay was 7.7 days (CI 4.2 to 10.7) shorter in the ESD group (9 RCTs). Hospital readmission rates were similar between groups (27% v 25%) (5 RCTs). Significant subgroup interaction existed with the presence or absence of coordinated, multidisciplinary ESD teams. ESD was more effective in patients with moderate than with severe stroke.

    CONCLUSION

    In patients admitted to hospital with stroke, an early supported discharge service with rehabilitation at home reduces death and disability more than conventional in-hospital care.

    Commentary

    The benefits of organised stroke services have been clearly shown in previous reviews.1 ESD is an approach common to many stroke services, and the rigorous and comprehensive meta-analysis by Langhorne et al can further inform both the design and delivery of services. The benefit of ESD shown in this review does not depend on whether organised stroke unit care is used as a comparison.

    Langhorne et al examined the composition of ESD teams within the trials and found a minimal role for nurses: the median number of nurses on ESD teams in the 11 included trials was 0. It would be interesting to establish whether this is typical of other ESD teams, as it brings into question the wider contribution of nursing to the patient rehabilitation process. The 11 trials were from 6 countries, and the role of nurses in the rehabilitation process may vary internationally.

    The conclusion of Langhorne et al highlights the potential benefits of “appropriately resourced and coordinated services.” This important point should not be lost on those seeking to develop ESD services. The subgroup analysis also shows that ESD services benefit patients with moderate stroke but may be less suitable for those with severe stroke.

    For nurses, this individual patient data meta-analysis indicates the patients most appropriately referred for ESD, whilst also questioning the role of nurses in existing ESD services. Perhaps it serves to highlight that services are most effective when tailored to meet patient needs. Similar to many trials of nurse led care, the professional background of those delivering care seems less important than adequate provision of organisational resources and training.

    References

    Early supported discharge (ESD) v conventional in-hospital care for stroke*

    
 
 Q In patients admitted to hospital with stroke, does an early supported discharge (ESD) service with rehabilitation at home provide better outcomes than conventional in-hospital care?

    View Abstract

    Footnotes

    • A modified version of this abstract appears in ACP Journal Club.

    • For correspondence: Professor P Langhorne, Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK. P.Langhorneclinmed.gla.ac.uk

    • Sources of funding: Stroke Association and Chest, Heart & Stroke Scotland.

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.