Evid Based Nurs 7:4-8 doi:10.1136/ebn.7.1.4
  • EBN users' guide

Evaluation of studies of prognosis

  1. Ellen Fineout-Overholt, RN, PhD,
  2. Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk, RN, PhD, CPNP, FAAN
  1. Center for Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice, University of Rochester School of Nursing, Rochester, New York, USA

      When patients first receive a diagnosis of a disease or condition, their initial questions often focus on “what can be done?”—that is, questions of treatment. Patients also want to know what will happen to them in the short and long term, in terms of disease progression, survival, and quality of life. These are questions of prognosis. For example, the family of a patient who has had a first ischaemic stroke will want to know if the patient will die, if current disabilities such as paralysis or aphasia will continue and for how long, what kind of life the patient can expect to have after discharge from hospital, and whether the patient is likely to have a recurrent stroke. The answers to some of these questions will likely influence decision making about treatment. If a patient is likely to die in the short term, families may be unwilling to initiate invasive treatments or those associated with pain or other adverse effects. Similarly, some conditions, such as the common cold, are self limiting and will resolve in time without treatment. In such cases, patients will often forgo treatment, especially if it is costly or has unpleasant side effects.

      Nurses, in various contexts, may be faced with questions of prognosis. It is therefore important for nurses to understand how to assess and interpret evidence related to disease prognosis. This users’ guide will focus on the critical appraisal of studies of prognosis. The specific questions that will guide this appraisal, initially outlined by Laupacis et al,1 are summarised below.

      Questions to help critically appraise studies of prognosis

      Are the results valid?

      1. Was there a representative and well defined sample of patients at a similar point in the course of the disease?

      2. Was follow up sufficiently long and complete?

      3. Were objective and unbiased …

      No Related Web Pages

      Free Sample

      This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EBN.
      View free sample issue >>

      EBN Journal Chat

      The EBN Journal Chat offers readers the opportunity to participate in discussion about research articles and commentaries from Evidence Based Nursing (EBN).

      How to participate >>

      Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

      Navigate This Article