rss
Evid Based Nurs 6:116 doi:10.1136/ebn.6.4.116
  • Treatment

Resistance exercises or vitamin D did not improve physical health or reduce falls in frail older people


 
 QUESTION: In frail older people, does a home based programme of quadriceps resistance exercise or vitamin D supplementation improve physical health and reduce falls?

Design

Randomised (allocation concealed), blinded (clinicians, patients, and outcome assessors), controlled, factorial design trial with 6 months of follow up.

Setting

5 teaching hospitals in Auckland, New Zealand and Sydney, Australia.

Patients

243 people admitted to geriatric rehabilitation units (inpatient or day wards) who were ≥65 years of age (mean age 79 y, 53% women), considered frail (≥1 health problem or functional limitation [eg, dependency in an activity of daily living, prolonged bed rest, impaired mobility, or a recent fall]), and had no indication or contraindication for the study treatments. Exclusion criteria included poor prognosis, severe cognitive impairment, physical limitations restricting adherence to the exercise programme, unstable cardiac status, and large ulcers around the ankles. Follow up was 91%.

Intervention

Patients were allocated to resistance exercise (n=120) or attention control (n=123) and to vitamin D (six 1.25 mg tablets of calciferol) (n=121) or placebo (n=122). The quadriceps resistance exercise involved warm up stretches and 3 sets of 8 repetitions of knee extensions using ankle cuff weights in a seated position 3 times per week for 10 weeks. Patients were monitored weekly by a physiotherapist, with alternating telephone calls and home visits. The attention control group received frequency matched telephone calls and home visits from the physiotherapist.

Main outcome measures

Self rated physical health (health related quality of life [HRQoL]) using the physical component score of the Medical Outcomes Study 36 item short form questionnaire at 3 months, and falls over 6 months. 25-hydroxyvitamin-D (25-OH-D) concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay. Adverse events were assessed.

Main results

Analysis was by intention to treat. Resistance exercises did not improve HRQoL or reduce the incidence of falls more than attention control (table). In only 1 measurement (timed up and go) did the groups differ, and the difference favoured attention control (p=0.045). Musculoskeletal injuries were more frequent in the resistance exercise group (18 v 5 people, relative risk 3.6, 95% CI 1.5 to 8.0). Vitamin D supplementation had no effect on HRQoL or incidence of falls (table), although 25-OH-D concentrations were higher in the vitamin D group than the placebo group (change from baseline to 3 mo 9 v 0 ng/ml).

Resistance exercise v attention control and vitamin D v placebo in frail older people*

Conclusions

In frail older people, neither a home based quadriceps resistance exercise programme nor vitamin D supplementation improved physical health or reduced the risk of falls. Resistance exercise led to a higher incidence of musculoskeletal injuries.

Commentary

  1. Deborah Messecar, RN, PhD, MPH
  1. Associate Professor, School of Nursing, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA

      Previous studies have shown the beneficial effects of exercise for older adults,1–3 but no consensus exists on the appropriate quantity, quality, or intensity of exercise necessary to promote improved health and function in this population. Hence, it is difficult to know what would work best for frail older adults. Latham et al and Schnelle et al explore the transferability of what has been learnt in clinical research into the delivery of efficient and cost effective interventions in 2 groups of frail older adults.

      The goal of the study by Latham et al was to identify an intervention that could be easily and inexpensively incorporated into existing home healthcare services. To decrease the complexity and improve the feasibility of the intervention, Latham et al selected 1 component of a multifaceted exercise programme and a 1 time dose of vitamin D for testing. However, neither simple quadriceps training nor vitamin D supplementation alone was sufficient to prevent falls in older adults who had recently been admitted to hospital.

      The purpose of the study by Schnelle et al was to determine if reducing the incidence of costly health conditions could offset additional staffing requirements needed to implement the intervention. However, the study was powered for a 16% improvement in outcomes, rather than the more modest 10% improvement achieved in the study. According to Schnelle et al and others,4 direct comparison of costs without weighting improvements in functionality and other desired outcomes may not be the best approach to determine if an intervention is worth the extra cost.

      The results of these studies are relevant to nurses who work in long term care and community settings with frail older adults. The findings increase our knowledge of factors that affect the translation of clinical research into everyday practice. Firstly, the intervention dose must be carefully considered; single strategies may not be effective for individuals with complex problems and needs. As Latham et al noted, an exercise programme using more muscle groups or performed for a longer duration may have been more effective, and other studies have shown the effectiveness of more complex exercise regimens, albeit not typically on such a frail population.5 The vitamin D supplementation dose was not sufficient to correct elevated parathyroid hormone concentrations that may be responsible for compromising muscle strength.5 Both calcium and vitamin D in sufficient quantities may be required to achieve the improvement sought.5

      Secondly, cost of the intervention may not be the most appropriate criterion for adoption into practice. Although it was hoped that the benefits might be gained at no extra cost, this is rarely achieved in health care. Decisions about resource allocation should be made on the basis of information about costs and benefits. The exercise and incontinence intervention tested in the NH clinical trial6 on which the economic analysis was based resulted in improvement or prevented decline in mobility, upper body strength, and continence in most of the intervention group patients. However, Schnelle et al found that the staffing requirements needed to implement the intervention (1 aide to 5 patients) exceeded the staff resources available in most (92%) NHs and were not offset by reductions in other costly care. Staffing limitations may therefore prevent the successful transfer of this and similar exercise and incontinence interventions to NH clinical practice. The data reported in this study provide evidence that nurses’ aide staffing ratios advocated in recent government studies and by consumer groups7 as necessary to provide high quality NH care are justified.

      References

      Footnotes

      • Sources of funding: Health Research Council of New Zealand; Auckland University of Technology Research Fund; Lenore Wilson Estate.

      • For correspondence: Dr N K Latham, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA. nlatham{at}bu.edu

      Free Sample

      This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EBN.
      View free sample issue >>

      EBN Journal Chat

      The EBN Journal Chat offers readers the opportunity to participate in discussion about research articles and commentaries from Evidence Based Nursing (EBN).

      How to participate >>

      Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.