Evid Based Nurs 6:100-103 doi:10.1136/ebn.6.4.100
  • Implementation forum

Building a foundation for evidence-based practice: experiences in a tertiary hospital

Table 2

Ratings for the top 8 evidence-based practice implementation models

Total rating for 5 criteria* Total rating for 3 core criteria*†
Model Mean (SD) Model Mean (SD)
*Highest possible total mean for the 5 criteria and 3 criteria ratings is 25 and 15, respectively.
†Core criteria: clear and concise; comprehensive; ease of use by clinicians.
Rosswurm and Larrabee8 20.00 (3.74) Rosswurm and Larrabee8 13.25 (1.26)
Iowa11 16.75 (6.02) Iowa11 10.25 (3.77)
Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia12 16.25 (6.80) Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia12 9.25 (4.50)
Stetler10 16.25 (2.22) Aurora9 8.80 (2.05)
Aurora9 15.20 (2.78) Stetler10 8.75 (1.26)
Diffusion of Innovation13 14.00 (8.79) Diffusion of Innovation13 8.75 (4.99)
Research Nurse Intern Program14 14.00 (7.35) Research Nurse Intern Program14 8.75 (4.27)
Process of Research Utilization15 12.75 (2.63) Process of Research Utilization15 8.75 (1.70)

This Article

Free Sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EBN.
View free sample issue >>

EBN Journal Chat

The EBN Journal Chat offers readers the opportunity to participate in discussion about research articles and commentaries from Evidence Based Nursing (EBN).

How to participate >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Navigate This Article