Evid Based Nurs 6:75 doi:10.1136/ebn.6.3.75
  • Treatment

Review: the Prentif cervical cap was as effective as the diaphragm in preventing pregnancy, and the FemCap was not

 QUESTION: Is the cervical cap more effective, safe, and acceptable than the diaphragm for contraception?

Data sources

Studies were identified by searching Medline, Popline, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, and LILACS; reviewing the references of pertinent articles; and contacting manufacturers and investigators in the field.

Study selection

Studies were selected if they were randomised controlled trials in any language comparing a cervical cap with a diaphragm in women of reproductive age with no contraindications to either barrier method.

Data extraction

2 reviewers independently extracted data on study quality (design, blinding, randomisation method, allocation concealment, follow up, and discontinuation rates), participant characteristics, type of cervical cap and diaphragm, and results. Extracted data were verified by a second reviewer. Outcomes were contraceptive efficacy, discontinuation, safety, and acceptability.

Main results

2 trials met the selection criteria: 1 trial compared the Prentif Cavity Rim Cervical Cap (Lamberts Ltd, Oxford, UK) with the Ortho diaphragm (Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation, Raritan, NJ, USA) (n=1529, 6–24 mo follow …

No Related Web Pages

Free Sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EBN.
View free sample issue >>

EBN Journal Chat

The EBN Journal Chat offers readers the opportunity to participate in discussion about research articles and commentaries from Evidence Based Nursing (EBN).

How to participate >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Navigate This Article