rss
Evid Based Nurs 5:80 doi:10.1136/ebn.5.3.80
  • Treatment

Review: evidence is incomplete on the benefits and risks of commonly used herbal medicines


 
 QUESTION: What are the benefits and risks of commonly used herbal medicines?

Data sources

Systematic reviews were identified by searching Medline, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, CISCOM, AMED, and the Cochrane Library (from inception to October 2000), and by contacting experts.

Study selection

Systematic reviews were selected if they included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) done in humans on ginkgo, St John's wort, ginseng, echinacea, saw palmetto, or kava.

Data extraction

Data were extracted on the common and manufacturer names and uses of each herbal medicinal product, type and quality of the systematic reviews, sample sizes, and results.

Main results

2 reviews (of adequate and good quality) of ginkgo showed positive effects on memory impairment, although these results are questionable because of the possibility of publication bias. 2 reviews (of adequate to good quality) of ginkgo showed beneficial effects in dementia. 1 adequate quality review of ginkgo for tinnitus also had questionable results because of the lack of rigorous trials. 1 good quality review of ginkgo for intermittent claudication showed …

No Related Web Pages

Free Sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EBN.
View free sample issue >>

EBN Journal Chat

The EBN Journal Chat offers readers the opportunity to participate in discussion about research articles and commentaries from Evidence Based Nursing (EBN).

How to participate >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Navigate This Article