|Weighted event rates|
|Outcome||Patient population||Feedback v control||RBR (95% CI)||NNT (CI)|
|*Abbreviations defined in glossary; RBR, RBI, NNT, and CI calculated from data in article. Meta-analyses were done using a random effects model.|
|Recognition||Unselected||25.7% v 26.9%||6% (−8 to 18)||Not significant|
|High risk||43.5% v 16.3%||168% (64 to 337)||4 (3 to 7)|
- Quality assurance
Review: questionnaire feedback to clinicians improves recognition of psychiatric disorders in high risk patients but not in all patients in non-psychiatric settings
EBN Twitter Journal Club
The club runs like other journal discussion groups, except that the article and questions are posted on this blog and
the discussion about the article happens on Twitter.
How to participate >>
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.