|Weighted event rates|
|Outcome||Patient population||Feedback v control||RBR (95% CI)||NNT (CI)|
|*Abbreviations defined in glossary; RBR, RBI, NNT, and CI calculated from data in article. Meta-analyses were done using a random effects model.|
|Recognition||Unselected||25.7% v 26.9%||6% (−8 to 18)||Not significant|
|High risk||43.5% v 16.3%||168% (64 to 337)||4 (3 to 7)|
- Quality assurance
Review: questionnaire feedback to clinicians improves recognition of psychiatric disorders in high risk patients but not in all patients in non-psychiatric settings
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EBN.
View free sample issue >>
EBN Journal Chat
The EBN Journal Chat offers readers the opportunity to participate in discussion about research articles and commentaries
from Evidence Based Nursing (EBN).
How to participate >>
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.