rss
Evid Based Nurs 4:111 doi:10.1136/ebn.4.4.111
  • Treatment

Combined permethrin (PER) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) was better than PER alone but not better than TMP/SMX alone for treating head lice infestation in children


 
 QUESTION: Is combined permethrin (PER) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) better than either PER or TMP/SMX alone for treating head lice infestation (HLI)?

Design

Randomised (unclear allocation concealment), blinded (unclear), controlled trial with 4 weeks of follow up.

Setting

3 private paediatric and family practices in San Joaquin County, California, USA.

Patients

115 children who were 2–13 years of age (70% girls) and had HLI (confirmed by inspection of scalp and hair for the presence of adult lice and nymphal stage or eggs). Children with hypersensitivity to TMP/SMX or 1% PER, or a history of parental non-compliance or neglect were excluded. 97% of children completed follow up.

Intervention

For all groups, parents were instructed to wash the child's hair with regular shampoo, rinse with water, and then comb thoroughly using a LiceMeister or fine toothed comb. 39 children were allocated to 1% PER creme rinse, which was applied to the scalp and hair for 10 minutes, rinsed with water before combing, and repeated at 1 week if HLI was still evident. 36 children were allocated to TMP/SMX, 10 mg/kg per day for 10 days. 40 children were allocated to combined 1% PER and TMP/SMX. Parents were asked to comb the child's hair using as many strokes as they could during the course of treatment.

Main outcome measure

Incidence of HLI.

Main results

Combined PER and TMP/SMX was better than PER alone (table) but was not better than TMP/SMX for reducing HLI at 2 weeks (5.0% v 16.7%, {p=0.l0}*) and 4 weeks (7.5% v 22.2%, {p=0.07}*). PER alone was not better than TMP/SMX at 2 weeks (20.5% v 16.7%, {p=0.67}*) and 4 weeks (28.2% v 22.2%, {p=0.55}*). No major adverse events were reported, but 3 children with an allergic appearing rash from TMP/SMX use were excluded from the analysis. Children with mild scalp irritation (n=3) from 1% PER use, or transient pruritis (n=9) or nausea and vomiting (n=3) from TMP/SMX use were not excluded.

Conclusions

Combined permethrin (PER) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) was better than PER alone but was not better than TMP/SMX alone for reducing head lice infestation at 2 and 4 weeks. PER was not better than TMP/SMX.

Combined 1% permethrin creme rinse (PER) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) v PER alone for head lice infestation (HLI) in children†


 
 QUESTION: Is combined permethrin (PER) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) better than either PER or TMP/SMX alone for treating head lice infestation (HLI)?

Footnotes

  • * p Values calculated from data in article.

  • Source of funding: not stated.

  • For correspondence: Dr R B Hipolito, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Neonatology, TB 193, Davis, CA 95616, USA. rbhipo{at}aol.com

Commentary

  1. Lynda Slimmer, RN,PhD, Professor
  1. School of Nursing Elmhurst College Elmhurst, Illinois, USA

      For the previous 30 years, HLI has been the most widespread and frustrating school health problem.1 The study by Hipolito et al cites evidence that this problem is now even more difficult to contain because lice have become resistant to the more common antipediculosis medications. Recognising that some methods to treat resistant lice are dangerous (eg, kerosene) or have not been documented in clinical trials to be effective or safe for children, the authors designed this study to investigate a combined drug treatment to be used when lice are resistant to first line treatments.

      Although the findings indicate that the combined drug treatment is effective, the setting and patient selection criteria may limit our ability to generalise results to all school aged children. The patients were recruited from private paediatric and family practices and children with a history of parental non-compliance were excluded from the study. Therefore, the effect of cost (1 of the drugs is prescription) and ease of use on parental compliance with the combined treatment might be the focus of future research.

      The results are especially relevant to public health nurses, school nurses, and paediatric nurse practitioners. Because the authors specifically recommend that the combined treatment not be used as the first treatment choice, it is essential that nurses assess whether initial treatment failure is related to motivational non-compliance, misunderstood directions (eg, language barrier or illiteracy), or resistant lice. This assessment and subsequent interventions may require collaboration between the public health nurse and the nurse practitioner or family doctor. In addition, the authors caution that there are potential side effects, especially from TMP/SMX. Therefore, nurses need to monitor children receiving the combined treatment for allergic or toxic reactions.

      References

      Free Sample

      This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EBN.
      View free sample issue >>

      EBN Journal Chat

      The EBN Journal Chat offers readers the opportunity to participate in discussion about research articles and commentaries from Evidence Based Nursing (EBN).

      How to participate >>

      Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.