rss
Evid Based Nurs 3:113 doi:10.1136/ebn.3.4.113
  • Treatment

Review: daily maintenance inhaled corticosteroidsare not effective for children with episodic viral wheeze


 
 QUESTION: Are inhaled corticosteroids, given episodically or daily, effective for treatment of children with viral episodic wheeze?

Data sources

Published and unpublished randomised controlled trials were identified in April 1999 by searching the Cochrane Airways Group database (which includes studies identified from searches of Medline, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, CINAHL, and hand searches of 16 core respiratory journals and the proceedings of 3 respiratory societies) using combinations of the terms asthma, wheez* (truncated), budesonide, pulmicort, beclomethasone, becotide, fluticasone, flixotide, triamcinolone, steroid, corticosteroid, glucocorticoid, inhaled, aerosolised, nebulised, child, infan*, pediatric, paediatric, and adolescen*; bibliographies of retrieved trials; and contacting authors.

Study selection

Studies were included if they involved children aged 0–17 years with viral episodic wheeze (defined as ≥2 episodes of wheezing associated with clinical viral infection with minimal or no symptoms between exacerbations). Studies of children with classical chronic asthma (ie, wheezing episodes caused by stimuli other than viruses) or chronic lung disease were excluded.

Data extraction

Data were extracted on study design and methods, characteristics of participants, interventions, and outcomes (main outcome was episodes requiring oral corticosteroids). Study quality was independently assessed by 2 reviewers using the Jadad score.

Main results

5 studies were included in the analysis: 3 studies examined episodic high dose inhaled steroids (n=122) and 2 examined low dose, daily maintenance inhaled corticosteroids (n=161). Episodic corticosteroids, compared with placebo, reduced exacerbations requiring emergency department visits (1 study, n=52) (table) and were associated with higher parent preferences (2 studies, n=120) (table); no group differences were found for exacerbations requiring oral steroids or hospital admission, severity of lower respiratory tract (LRT) symptoms, or sleep disturbance. Daily maintenance corticosteroids, compared with placebo, did not reduce exacerbations requiring oral steroids, emergency department visits, or hospital admissions; duration and severity of episodes with LRT symptoms; frequency of wheezing episodes; frequency, severity, and duration of PEF reductions; and FEV1 changes.

Episodic inhaled corticosteroids v placebo for episodic viral wheeze in children*

Conclusion

Among children with episodic viral wheeze, episodic treatment with inhaled corticosteroids reduces exacerbations requiring emergency department visits and is preferred by parents; daily maintenance treatment does not improve any outcomes.

Commentary

  1. Gene Elizabeth Harkless, RN, DNSc, ARNP
  1. Associate Professor/Family Nurse Practitioner Department of Nursing, University of New Hampshire Durham, New Hampshire, USA

      Among children <5 years of age, the most common cause of asthma symptoms is viral upper respiratory infection.1 Many children become symptomatic with wheezing before the age of 2 years.2 Some will develop asthma; others will not. How should we treat these young children who may or may not have asthma? McKean and Ducharme focused their systematic review on whether episodic or daily maintenance inhaled corticosteroids are effective for viral episodic wheeze in children. It is a noteworthy question as the US National Asthma Education and Prevention Program1 and the more recent American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology3 are cautious about the use of inhaled steroids, despite evidence of their general usefulness and safety4 for these wheezing children who may or may not have asthma.

      Primary care nurses face the challenge of treating essentially well young children who wheeze with upper respiratory infections. The evidence from the 5 European studies included in this systematic review provide preliminary evidence of the usefulness of episodic inhaled corticosteroids in children as young as 7 months of age. The studies, however, varied in the type, dose, and delivery of inhaled corticosteroids, and no attempt was made to stratify children with atopic wheeze from those with non-allergic wheeze to uncover whether different disease processes were at work. Also, the generalisability of the positive findings of parent preference and a reduction in emergency department visits is unclear, as countries outside of Europe may have very different healthcare systems. For example, in the US, national guidelines do not promote inhaled corticosteroids for even mild intermittent asthma,3 and, until July 2000, no inhaled corticosteroid had been labelled for use in children younger than 4 years of age.

      References

      Footnotes

      • Source of funding: no external funding.

      • For correspondence: Dr M McKean, Department of Child Health, University of Leicester, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, Royal Infirmary PO Box 65, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK. Fax +44 (0)116 252 3282.

      No Related Web Pages

      Free Sample

      This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EBN.
      View free sample issue >>

      EBN Journal Chat

      The EBN Journal Chat offers readers the opportunity to participate in discussion about research articles and commentaries from Evidence Based Nursing (EBN).

      How to participate >>

      Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.