rss
Evid Based Nurs 3:85 doi:10.1136/ebn.3.3.85
  • Assessment

Individualised limits for SpO2 were no better than fixed limits for detecting hypoxia or hyperoxia in sick infants


 
 QUESTION: Are individualised limits for arterial oxyhaemaglobin saturation (SpO2) assessed by pulse oximetry as accurate as fixed limits for detecting hypoxia and hyperoxia in sick newborn infants?

Design

Comparison of sensitivities and specificities of individualised and fixed SpO2 limits for detecting hypoxia or hyperoxia.

Setting

A neonatal intensive care unit in Liverpool, UK.

Patients

95 infants (68% boys, median gestational age 28 weeks, median birth weight 1165 g) who required arterial lines. Infants with structural congenital cardiac lesions were excluded.

Description of tests and diagnostic standard

Simultaneous measurements of SpO2 and partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) (diagnostic standard) taken over a 3 year period. For each infant, ≥2 sets of measurements were required, taken ≤6 hours apart. For each pair of measurements, sensitivity and specificity of fixed SpO2 limits for detecting hypoxia (PaO2 <6 kPa) and hyperoxia (PaO2 >10 kPa) were calculated. Individualised SpO2 limits were calculated retrospectively using a standard equation for the shape of the oxygen-haemoglobin dissociation curve; these limits were then applied to the next pair of measurements in that infant.

Main outcome measures

Sensitivity and specificity of individualised and fixed limits of SpO2 for detecting hypoxia and hyperoxia.

Main results

A total of 692 simultaneous measurements of SpO2 and PaO2 were taken. Individualised SpO2 lower limits for hypoxia had similar test properties (sensitivities and specificities) to a fixed lower limit of 91% and individualised upper limits for hyperoxia were similar to a fixed upper limit of 96% (table).

Test properties of Sp02 for detection of hypoxia in sick infants*

Test properties of Sp02 for detection of hyperoxia in sick infants*

Conclusion

When monitoring arterial oxyhaemaglobin saturation by pulse oximetry, individualised limits were no better than fixed limits for detecting hypoxia or hyperoxia in sick infants.

Commentary

  1. Jennifer Medves, RN, PhD
  1. School of Nursing, Queen's University Kingston, Ontario, Canada

      In premature and sick newborn infants, hypoxia is associated with organ damage and pulmonary hypertension and hyperoxia is associated with retinopathy of prematurity.1 It is important, therefore, to have an accurate measure for monitoring arterial oxygen levels so that appropriate levels can be maintained and adverse events prevented. Pulse oximetry is the standard for monitoring SpO2 in newborns.2 Gupta et al examined whether fixed SpO2 limits for identifying hypoxia and hyperoxia were as good as individualised limits derived from previous readings for a given infant. The derivation of these individualised limits was based on a complex formula that accounted for the oxygen-haemoglobin curve.

      The study results indicate that the sensitivities and specificities of individualised limits were similar to those of fixed limits. Sensitivity and specificity values can, however, be misleading when used as a basis for clinical decision making because they restrict us to only 2 levels of results (positive and negative).3 In this study, many different levels (limits) were assessed, and therefore, it may be more informative to consider likelihood ratios (LRs), which tell us how much the probability of hypoxia (or hyperoxia) changes from baseline when the test is positive (positive LR) or negative (negative LR). Positive LRs >2 and negative LRs <0.1 should be considered in clinical decision making. As we can see from the LRs calculated from the data in this study, neither fixed nor individualised lower limits for detecting hypoxia had positive LRs >2 or negative LRs <0.1, and fixed and individualised limits had similar LRs for SpO2 limits of 89% (positive LR) and 90% (negative LR). For hyperoxia, a fixed upper limit of 97% and individualised limits both had positive LRs >2, whereas fixed limits of 94% and 95% had negative LRs <0.1. Given this, it does not appear that that the additional work required to establish individualised SpO2 limits resulted in better accuracy for identification of hypoxia or hyperoxia.

      Nevertheless, the results of this study will be useful to nurses working in NICUs in determining optimal upper and lower limits for setting alarms. When determining these limits, clinicians should also be aware that hypothermia, cardiac anomalies, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, pH, and haemoglobin levels can affect the accuracy of pulse oximetry.4

      References

      Footnotes

      • Source of funding: no external funding.

      • For correspondence: Dr N J Shaw, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Crown Street, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK. Fax +44 (0)151 702 4082.

      Free Sample

      This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EBN.
      View free sample issue >>

      EBN Journal Chat

      The EBN Journal Chat offers readers the opportunity to participate in discussion about research articles and commentaries from Evidence Based Nursing (EBN).

      How to participate >>

      Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.