Responses

PDF
Qualitative synthesis
Clarification of the common aspects of dignity in end-of-life care
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]
Publication Date - String

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

  • Published on:
    Letter of response to the commentary by Trussardi and Gott on the common aspects of dignity in end-of-life care

    Dear Editor,

    Trussardi and Gott[1] provide an insightful commentary on our integrative review paper on dignity in end-of-life care.[2] They raise some interesting points about the definition of dying with dignity in end- of-life care, some with which we concur and others would view differently.

    People in different cultural, social and historical contexts may understand the concept of dignity differently. H...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.