You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Nursing issues
Survey
Best interest standards do not correlate with the reality of physicians' decision making in life and death choices
  1. Antoine Payot
  1. Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Antoine Payot
    Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine, 3175, Côte-Ste-Catherine, Montreal, QC H3T 1C5, Canada; antoine.payot{at}umontreal.ca

https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2011-100148

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Commentary on: Laventhal N, Spelke MB, Andrews B, et al. Ethics of resuscitation at different stages of life: a survey of perinatal physicians. Pediatrics 2011;127:1221–9.OpenUrlCrossRef

    Implications for nursing practice and research

    • ■ Clinicians appear to take decisions relating to resuscitation and non-resuscitation that do not always adhere to the best interest standard used in clinical ethical guidelines.

    • ■ Discrepancies between best interest valuation and the respect of families' requests not to resuscitate shows that shared decision making is lacking in most cases.

    • ■ There is a need for a shared decision making process with all patients and surrogates.

    • ■ Further research is needed to explore decision making in this context.

    Context

    The best interests standard is widely used in clinical ethical guidelines to frame emergency medicine practice in the absence of guidance by patients or their family. It is at the heart of the beneficence …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests None.