rss
Evid Based Nurs 14:45-46 doi:10.1136/ebn1131
  • Health promotion
  • Systematic review

Nucleic acid amplification tests are more accurate and cost-effective than the Chlamydia rapid test for diagnosing genital chlamydia

  1. Thomas L Gift
  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  1. Correspondence to Thomas L Gift
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS E-80, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA; tgift{at}cdc.gov

Commentary on:

Background

Chlamydia is the most prevalent bacterial sexually transmitted infection in the world and has been associated with reproductive sequelae in women, though the frequency with which sequelae develop is not precisely known.1 2 As most cases of chlamydia are asymptomatic, screening – primarily of women – has been the primary intervention used to control chlamydia.2 Screening programmes typically involve collecting a specimen from a patient, sending it to a lab for processing and notifying the patient of results and arranging treatment if positive. As Hislop and colleagues note, …

Free Sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EBN.
View free sample issue >>

EBN Journal Chat

The EBN Journal Chat offers readers the opportunity to participate in discussion about research articles and commentaries from Evidence Based Nursing (EBN).

How to participate >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Navigate This Article