rss
Evid Based Nurs 13:20-21 doi:10.1136/ebn1028
  • Therapeutics
  • Systematic review

Little evidence from randomised controlled trials regarding effects of routine health promotion interventions for pregnant women

  1. Mary M Aruda
  1. Mary M Aruda
    Boston College, Connell School of Nursing, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA; Mary.aruda{at}bc.edu

Commentary on:

Morbidity and mortality measures related to pregnancy-associated infant and maternal health have either remained stable or deteriorated worldwide over the past several years. Whitworth and Dowswell undertook an evidence-based review in the important area of prepregnancy health promotion interventions for improving pregnancy outcomes. The authors use the rationale that despite the enthusiasm among women and health professionals for routine pre-pregnancy care, evidence on its effectiveness is required before widespread implementation can be advocated. Unfortunately, only four studies were included in their review on the basis of the gold standard of randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials. Selection criteria were stated as inclusion of studies of health promotion interventions (addressing smoking, excessive alcohol intake and poor nutrition) that aimed to identify and modify risk factors before pregnancy in all women …

This article has not yet been cited by other articles.

Free Sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EBN.
View free sample issue >>

EBN Journal Chat

The EBN Journal Chat offers readers the opportunity to participate in discussion about research articles and commentaries from Evidence Based Nursing (EBN).

How to participate >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Navigate This Article