rss
Evid Based Nurs 12:84 doi:10.1136/ebn.12.3.84
  • Treatment

Hospital and home rehabilitation did not differ for functional competence in activities of daily living

QUESTION

In patients discharged from hospital and referred for rehabilitation, how does home rehabilitation compare with hospital rehabilitation?

METHODS

Design:

randomised controlled trial. ACTRN 12605000638639.

Allocation:

concealed.

Blinding:

blinded (occupational therapist, {data collectors, outcome assessors, and data analysts}*).

Follow-up period:

6 months.

Setting:

patients’ homes or day hospitals in Adelaide, Australia.

Patients:

229 patients (mean age 72 y, 52% women) who were medically stable, ready to be discharged from hospital, and required ⩾12 rehabilitation sessions. Patients were excluded if they lived outside of the health region or were judged by the referring physician to be unsuitable for rehabilitation.

Intervention:

rehabilitation in a day hospital (n = 113) or at home (n = 116). Hospital rehabilitation consisted of 3-hour high-intensity individual or group sessions, 3–5 times/week for 4–6 …

No Related Web Pages

Free Sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EBN.
View free sample issue >>

EBN Journal Chat

The EBN Journal Chat offers readers the opportunity to participate in discussion about research articles and commentaries from Evidence Based Nursing (EBN).

How to participate >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Navigate This Article