Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Occlusive dressings and gauze dressings did not differ for healing open wounds in surgical patients

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

D T Ubbink

Dr D T Ubbink, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; d.ubbink@amc.nl

QUESTION

How do occlusive dressings compare with gauze dressings for healing open wounds in surgical patients?

METHODS

Design:

randomised controlled trial. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN56264738.

Allocation:

concealed.

Blinding:

blinded {data collectors and outcome assessors}.*

Follow-up period:

up to complete wound healing or 6 months.

Setting:

Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Patients:

285 surgical inpatients (mean age 57 y, 65% men) with open wounds requiring local wound care. Exclusion criteria included burn wounds, ulcerating malignancies, closed wounds, ostomies or drain openings, pin holes from external fracture fixation materials, and chemotherapy or local irradiation.

Intervention:

local wound care with occlusive (n = 142) or gauze dressings (n = 143).

Outcomes:

included complete …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Source of funding: Smith & Nephew; Johnson & Johnson; ConvaTec; 3M.